2 things the col. doesn't want you to know!

1. Just what the hell a Repugnant is, I have tried to ask him to no avail. Perhaps I shall never know

2. That Bill Clinton was one of the worst morally corrupt presidents....oh wait, we already knew that.

Make that 1 thing the col. doesn't want you to know!

Originally posted by mysteriousbob
1. Just what the hell a Repugnant is, I have tried to ask him to no avail. Perhaps I shall never know

2. That Bill Clinton was one of the worst morally corrupt presidents....oh wait, we already knew that.

Make that 1 thing the col. doesn't want you to know!

i love this....quite amusing.

of course he'll take great offense to it just to be a PITA whiner.

but i know colonel dodges more questions than clinton could ever dream of...so this isnt surprising that he cant or wont tell you exactly what a repugnant is.

specifici answers are definitive, he likes to keep things vague and blurred hoping you'll miscontrue what he says so he can bash you again.

thats why he hates me, i ask too many direct questions that he wont answer with a direct answer.

Originally posted by mysteriousbob
1. Just what the hell a Repugnant is, I have tried to ask him to no avail. Perhaps I shall never know

2. That Bill Clinton was one of the worst morally corrupt presidents....oh wait, we already knew that.

Make that 1 thing the col. doesn't want you to know!

Only 2 things? jeez.

I could find more but then again i'm not exactly batting for the republican side.

I'm not a commie or a pinko or a socialist, i'm a liberal and i believe in our ideals, just like republicans believe in their ideals, we admire those who uphold our policies well regardless of their pasts or problems during their presidency.

I see no point in even slinging mud anymore, if you've chosen a side and stick to it then good for you, if you havent then you need to make that decision on your own without any kind of propaganda.

For the record, i think the Colonel is so disgusted by the term republican (you melodramatic old dog ) that he's picked a euphemism for them, namely the term Repugnant.

Oh, I wasn't picking on the col. political affiliation, just that he seems very aloof and elusive when it comes to explaining himself....he seems to not want to tell anyone anything.

you forgot one


Bill clinton was resposible for this: 3000+ innocent lives being lost in the most deadly attack on american soil ever!

yup, I forgot that one, thanks.

Which is true, his failures at trying to contain terrorism because he was playing up to Policitally Correctness (See previous forum on PC for more)

It is truely saddening to see a figure of power give up 3000 american lives in order to look good for the world.

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
you forgot one


Bill clinton was resposible for this: 3000+ innocent lives being lost in the most deadly attack on american soil ever!

So whats the bodycount in Iraq?
And Afghanistan?

I'm getting tired of people that support political parties cause they grease their palms and then they pretend they do it for the greater good.

Shame on you repugnants!

Clap...Clap...Clap...Clap...
Repugnant=Republican! Incredible! What a novel way to go about things! Calling things by mildly witty names in a lame attempt to insult them! Why didn't I think of that first!

(Scurrys off to call all acquantences to tell them of new discovery)

Originally posted by THENEO
I'm getting tired of people that support political parties cause they grease their palms and then they pretend they do it for the greater good.

Shame on you repugnants!

sigh....yet another one who has discoverd the fun term repugnant.....yippe. I'm so happy now!

the character Pat from saturday night live is less ambiguous than colonel...or is it just me???

Credibility ruined by lack of a spellcheck.

Originally posted by ThePrankMonkey
the character Pat from saturday night live is less ambiguous than colonel...or is it just me???

Nice, nice. Pat is definitly less ambigous.

Its just that, well, he likes to be i guess...

However, lets switch topic to : Why people seem to like the term Repugnant

I think its because they like to come up with witty terms to use. It probably makes them look smarter. And I for one am going to call the rest of them Bleeding heart liberals....thats a good term, funny sounding too.

Originally posted by mysteriousbob
However, lets switch topic to : Why people seem to like the term Repugnant

Its a cheapshot.

Then again, everyone uses them.

Originally posted by Nerdling

Originally posted by KrazyIvan
you forgot one


Bill clinton was resposible for this: 3000+ innocent lives being lost in the most deadly attack on american soil ever!

So whats the bodycount in Iraq?
And Afghanistan?

Your complaining about a few civilains getting killed? i know its an awful thing but it happens in war. in every war sence man started declaring war on each other, innocents were killed. it will always happen thers nothing you can do about it. the 3000+ cilvilians on 9/11 were the direct target of the attack. in war they are not. if it happens it happens. get used to it.

Originally posted by Nerdling

Originally posted by mysteriousbob
However, lets switch topic to : Why people seem to like the term Repugnant

Its a cheapshot.

Then again, everyone uses them.

yup, look there's one now!



several more cheap shots from the uzi....



and i wouldnt say everyone uses them. i dont as i dont obsess over a certain political party and let it controlmy every thought until i'm a bitter person like other people on this board who shall go nameless...

i also dont get the point of it. does it accomplish anything? does it even make the person feel better ultimately? from my observations no, it only reenforces the behavior anger bitterness and resentment they already have.

i liken it gettting your mind (visualize it as a skinny tire) getting stuck in a deep rut in the road. once its in that rut its hard to get out of that rut, not impossible just hard but many choose to believe that either they are not in a rut or dont care and seem to enjoy being a bitter pill in life.

in either case i dont associate myself with people like that.

[Edited on 7-11-2003 by ThePrankMonkey]

www.iraqbodycount.net...

More than a few, then again, any civilian killed is one too many,collateral damage can only kill so many, the rest is down to neglect and incompetence.

Originally posted by ThePrankMonkey

Originally posted by Nerdling

Originally posted by mysteriousbob
However, lets switch topic to : Why people seem to like the term Repugnant

Its a cheapshot.

Then again, everyone uses them.

yup, look there's one now!

several more cheap shots from the uzi....

That had better be one of your clowny pop guns

Damn, didn't think I would get this many people to post much.

I would just like to say that even though we went into war in Iraq, we didn't kill civilians on purpose. If they tried to attack our soliders, what do you think was going to happen. It's this PC crap that is going to make our army get shot up all the time.

What the hell do you want us to do, put flowers in our guns and sing kumbayah?