It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

State Department tries to debunk 9/11 theories on official website!!

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 08:09 PM
link   
Oh you have to see this...


While looking for more info on the infamous Put-Options trades on the days before the September 11th attacks I typed "put options on 9/11" on Google. To my amazement the seventh link to come up is an official State Department website in 6 languages claiming to have the final word on the 9/11 attacks and attempting to debunk all the theories about the the WTC & WTC7 building collapse and the attack on the pentagon. They also claim that there was a perfectly logical explanation for the exorbitant amount of put-options trading during the days before 9/11 on airlines and insurance companies affected by the 9/11 attacks.

Can the State Department run this kind of debunking operation from its official website, out in the open like this? This just doesnt seem right. For the State Department to run their own opinions as God given fact using our tax money, just smells funny...

Charles

usinfo.state.gov...




posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 10:51 PM
link   
I like how they claim that the primary piece of "evidence" in favor of WTC7 being a demo is Silverstein's quote. Just forget the fact that it fell straight down at the speed of free fall into a neat pile, whereas no steel structure on Earth has ever totally collapsed from fire to begin with.

Of course only NIST is referenced for Towers 1 and 2. It's like NIST's significance to the official story is not what they say, but just the fact that they tried to say something. And that something wasn't much, as they only attempted to explain how the collapses initiated. Beyond the first floors to fail, nothing. How did the core fail? Nothing. How did the buildings fall all the way to their bases, without slowing? Nothing. How was most of the mass ejected at the same time, primarily in four directions? Nothing. All their three-year report says is that they think the first floors to fail could have failed from a few columns buckling on the perimeter on some of the highest floors.



posted on Sep, 30 2006 @ 12:54 AM
link   
This clearly demonstrates how the US Government is getting terribly nervous about the information being spread by the truth movement. The orchestrators of the disaster are helpless to stop it now.

Here's a link to a very enlightening and optimistic article by Morgan Reynolds, PhD. The Risk of Winning: What Happens Once the 9/11 Sewer Opens Wide?

Reynolds' bio is quite impressive.



new topics
 
0

log in

join