Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Nobody would like a known future threat. And no I am not the ONLY person who thinks that way. Didn't you post something Donald Rumsfeld said, you
know about a Chinese threat? I doubt he and I are the only people who think that way
LOL, you're going to quote Donald Rumsfield? Of all people... him? Even if you people view China as a "threat," what do you propose? Bombing the
hell out of them? Invading them?
Instead of comtemplating ways of befriending China and starting off better relations, you suggest we figure out ways to contain and destroy them?
Thank God nearly everyone else figures out that former would be better than the latter.
What else would the west be using China for?
And those "millions" of other places are being used already. India, Nepal, etc. All being used! Isn't that nice of the west...helping
developing countries and all?
Wow... You actually believe the only reason the West "needs" China is because of cheap labor? This, I believe, is a new low... even for you
retinoid. lol, "already being used." In your logic, there wouldn't be unemployment in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, etc. would there? LOL, think
again... please... just THINK again.
If China's cheap labor was thing the west "needed" and that the west could destroy China's economy by switching ot other nations instead, than
using that logic, what kind of threat is there?
You seem to forget, that this trade game is a two-way street. Both the United States and China benefit from each other GREATLY. Isn't the United
States 8 trillion dollars in debt, and who is paying for that? Any type of trade war would be a disaster for both nations.
f Taiwan attacks China though, then they would be no doubt supported by more countries.
LOL, NAME ONE. Your statements get more ridiculous everytime you post. Name ONE country that would support Taiwan attacking China. LOL, how do I even
respond to such an idiotic statement?
First of all, retinoid, the United States has stated that if Taiwan causes ANY anger by even HINTING towards independence, the U.S. would drop it's
policy of defending Taiwan. So... how does your statement even remotely make sense?
Let's be serious though. China's main goal at the moment is to become an economic power and help their many impoverished people. They will
not be able to do that with attacking Taiwan, being condemned by the US, EU, and Japan, and investors from all these countries withdrawing their
investments from China due to this crisis.
I would also like to know what would happen to the U.S.'s economy when China starts dumping trillions of dollars...
That would be ridiculous if I said that without proof that the EU would defend Taiwan militarily. But it is also ridiculous for you to say the
EU would support an invasion by China to Taiwan.
Uh... sir? I have PROVED many times that members of the EU support an invasion by China to Taiwan. Do you even READ my posts? France has passed a law
PERMITTING China to invade Taiwan.