It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chomsky: 911 Conspiracy if True, who cares

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2006 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Asked if the 911 attacks was an inside job. Noam Chomsky's response

"The evidence has been produced, in my opinion, essentially is worthless.
Even if it's true, who cares. Doesn't have any significance.

It's like this heavy energy put out trying to find who killed John F. Kennedy. Who knows. Who cares. Plenty of people get killed all the time. Why does it matter if one of them happened to be John F. Kennedy?"
youtube.com...

Who cares? Does not matter, if 911 conspiracy is true? You can be damn sure it does matter.

From history and wars, we know the globalist, New World Order control both sides. I think the NWO has Noam Chomsky and Hugo Chavez. I was always suspicious how Chavez can still be alive. How hard is it for the globalist to kill Chavez if they wanted to? I would imagine pretty easily. Then, you have this Citgo gas station service Pentagon personnel.

Bad cop, good cop. They are playing the US are the bad guy and Chomsky/Chavez good guy to the world.




posted on Oct, 1 2006 @ 05:01 AM
link   
Yeah, i know this is Chomskys stand-point. To be fair, within his area of specialism he has no option than to completely deny inside job.

The really odd thing is he says [paraphrased]

if it was true, it would have come out. The admin would have to be insane.

well Mr Chomsky, the information has come out and the administration/power elites worldwide are insane.



posted on Oct, 1 2006 @ 05:24 AM
link   
If there was a conspiracy there would have be to many people involved ,something or someone would of leaked info.

Did the Government have prior knowledge of the attacks? Probably.Did they do anything about it?No.Did our Government plan any of the events's? More then likely not.



posted on Oct, 2 2006 @ 09:53 AM
link   
Chomsky is a left wing gatekeeper. Please tell me how a 'radical' gets to work at MIT for the last thirty + years. MIT is owned by the US Air Force, meaning that the core of funding at MIT is primarily footed by the Air Force. He sadly is worshipped still as a liberal god, with the blinded hanging on his every word. He's a fraud and his comments are exactly what I would have expected. He falls in line with Amy Goodman, Al Franken, Bill Maher and Jon Stewart as the messengers of allowable dissent!



posted on Oct, 2 2006 @ 11:10 AM
link   
It's a good point that Chomsky makes, really no one cares if you look at it population wise. No one wants to believe their government would do something like this, they see it as history and something that should be left alone. No one cares enough.



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 02:21 AM
link   
Chomskys 'good point' of no-one cares is not inline with his area of study.

He is determined to show how the media is controlling and a source of propaganda, therefore the spurious fact that no-one cares is subjective rational and hypocritical reasoning.

Point to note;

Chomsky has said many times in discussions he doesnt believe false-flag operations exist. Instead they are authoritive controlled narratives released in order to preserve the perception that government and gov agencies are in total control.



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 03:28 AM
link   
Chomskys veiws are that of a wicked old man!! I find it offensive and down right unmoral to say that you dont care about people's lifes! Who cares? Alot of us do!
I care! and Thanks for ATS giving us a place to speak our minds! And show that we care!



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 08:03 AM
link   
the context in which he says 'who cares' is an allegory to more important issues (in his opinion) that prove that Bush capitalised upon the attacks. Chomsky doesnt believe that the ruling elite planned and executed the attacks.

The capital theory is paramount to Chomskys theories and analysis. Capital is a fraudulant theory which needs to be addressed.



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 08:06 AM
link   
Chomsky's "opinion" can be best explained in his own words, I believe:

"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate."

He's a gatekeeper. He's part of the system. The suggestion that the exposure of 9/11 wouldn't matter is blatantly absurd on its face...

Everyone read this and spread the word, please!



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 08:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by nQuire
Chomsky's "opinion" can be best explained in his own words, I believe:

"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate."

He's a gatekeeper. He's part of the system. The suggestion that the exposure of 9/11 wouldn't matter is blatantly absurd on its face...

Everyone read this and spread the word, please!


Quoted for truth. Chomsky is a fraud and on the payroll for sure. READ WHAT IS QOUTED ABOVE and file Chomsky under 'tool'.



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by tazadar
From history and wars, we know the globalist, New World Order control both sides. I think the NWO has Noam Chomsky and Hugo Chavez... Bad cop, good cop. They are playing the US are the bad guy and Chomsky/Chavez good guy to the world.

I have to say i share this sentiment & would throw michael moore into the mix as well. I feel they may well have their own figureheads 'planted' or controlled, to represent various mindsets, so you are always following one of their candidates, even if you are being a 'free-thinking dissident'. That's what I would do if I was writing the script anyhow.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join