It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
Their pathetic fathers, and maybe mothers are brainwashing their kids to hate, and be violent.
If these people had any brain at all, they would be peaceful, or at least pretend to be peaceful, so we can get the hell out of there already. The only reason we are still there is because there is still violence, people are still attacking the Americans, and their government and law enforcement (that we are helping to build) isn't quite strong enough yet.
If we leave Iraq now, and they are attacking us as we leave, they will think they won, and more attacks on USA would be a probability.
If we get the place to be peaceful, and an American troop can walk down the streets without fear of getting blown up or shot, then we might leave.
Originally posted by tha stillz
I just spent about 2 hours sitting at the bar with a marine who shot a kid who had a gun aiming behind a pile of rubble over in Iraq. .. Believe me, he feels bad, but if you were going to die, would you shoot a kid. or anyone? In this situation yes - I would.
By the way, I am really glad he was there to have that conversation.
[edit on 21-9-2006 by tha stillz]
One young Iraqi man told us that he was trained by the Americans as a policeman in Baghdad and he spent 70 per cent of his time learning to drive and 30 per cent in weapons training. They said to him: 'Come back in a week.' When he went back, they gave him a mobile phone and told him to drive into a crowded area near a mosque and phone them. He waited in the car but couldn't get the right mobile signal. So he got out of the car to where he received a better signal. Then his car blew up."
Impossible, I think to myself. But then I remember how many times Iraqis in Baghdad have told me similar stories.
Originally posted by xmotex
I think it's hard to get across that a lot of us don't think this war serves any legitimate purpose, and that conflicts with a soldier's need to believe in the mission he's been assigned.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Originally posted by tha stillz
I just spent about 2 hours sitting at the bar with a marine who shot a kid who had a gun aiming behind a pile of rubble over in Iraq. .. Believe me, he feels bad, but if you were going to die, would you shoot a kid. or anyone? In this situation yes - I would.
By the way, I am really glad he was there to have that conversation.
[edit on 21-9-2006 by tha stillz]
Thats the sad thing Tha stillz,
neither one should have been put in that predicament. The marine undoubtedly will have to deal with that for the rest of his life, and that kid who probably would have just been out playing with other kids or at school or home eating dinner with family if we had not been there. Just like all these kids that are now going to go to trial for murdering those Iraqis, the americans already convicted of wrongdoing in Abu Gharib and a few other incidents as well...all of that could have been avoided. Its we the Pe(ons)ople who suffer in the end...
Originally posted by rich23
This is what a psychologist would call projection. The US is the violent one. It's gone into that country, waged an unprovoked war for oil, wrecked the economy, and occupied it with some violence. There have been plenty of people interned and tortured by the US, pregnant women have been shot on the way to hospital, and the US backs death squads that roam the cities.
I'm sorry, but for the reasons posted above, I think this is delusional.
Originally posted by Langolier
Mmmhm. The U.S. is violent... yes, of-course, but are you telling me the enemy isn't? What you are doing is justifying murder.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
I will agree that they are enemies now, but they were not before
All this latest report does, in addition to the one revealing that abductees are again being used as forced suicide bombers, does is confirm the justification for our side in this conflict. We aren't the barbarians, they are. Look at the whole thing with an ounce of compassion and a dose of common sense and you might see that.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
What enemy?? There were no WMD's, there were NO AL-Queda ties, No training camps, NOTHING! So who is trying to justify what? Rich or You? Who is being the appologist here? It is you..making up stories to accomodate your hatred for Muslims. Either you have been in a state of solitary confinement for the past several years or you are making excuses. Show us proof that these people were our enemies before we stepped foot into that country. Something that was proven to be true as a basis for war. Not this secondary freedom garbage that was used AFTER the fact.
I will agree that they are enemies now, but they were not before...we made some new ones along the way.
Originally posted by xmotex
The issue is not "taking the oil" - the idea is simply to ensure the oil is in friendly hands.
The hands of people that won't cut off the supply because we do something like encourage Israel to bomb a few hundred civilians to paste in Lebanon, etc...
right? those friendly hands?