It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Scientists have found that oxygen and the life that generates it
might have enriched the Earth far earlier than currently supposed.
The discovery, sure to be controversial, suggests life could arise
earlier than now thought on alien planets, too.
Currently, scientists widely believe photosynthetic microbes helped
oxygenate the planet roughly 2.4 billion years ago, and that oxygen
was scant in the atmosphere before then.
They base this idea on isotopes of sulfur in ancient rocks.
Isotopes of sulfur all behave virtually the same chemically but have
slightly different masses.
Rocks older than 2.4 billion years contain abnormal ratios of sulfur
isotopes compared with younger rocks. The only way known to
generate these abnormal ratios are reactions between sunlight and
sulfurous volcanic gas in the absence of an ozone shield that would
normally help screen out ultraviolet rays.
Ozone is a form of oxygen, and if the atmosphere has no ozone,
it is assumed it has no oxygen.
Geochemist Hiroshi Ohmoto, director of the Penn State Astrobiology
Research Center and his colleagues examined rocks from western
Australia laid down as sediments on a lakebed and the ocean floor
between about 2.76 and 2.92 billion years ago. These displayed sulfur
isotope ratios like those of more modern rocks from higher oxygen eras.
An implication of the new findings is that "an oxygen-rich atmosphere,
generated by oxygen-producing organisms, may be found in young,
as well as old, planets of other stars," he said.
The new findings could mean oxygen levels on Earth were uniformly high
since 3.8 billion years ago, Ohmoto said. They could also mean oxygen
levels went through yo-yo fluctuations between highs and lows.
Alternatively, ultraviolet radiation from the sun might not be the only
way that can generate the abnormal ratios of sulfur isotopes seen in
older rocks.
LiveScience.com
Originally posted by Stratrf_Rus
I don't believe this is the key factor in life. Undoubtedly the Moon is far more influential than A) we give credit and B) than timing of chemical developement or evolution.
The Moon's scared face shows us just how vital a role it played in the stability that allowed life to take a final root.
I suppose to me this is merely interesting as in a note rather than evidence of say...aliens.
Originally posted by Stratrf_Rus
Wow Iori way to quote a Geol 101 book.
The point is (not to be rude but I am blunt) that the Moon has absorbed that many more impacts than the Earth, and thus has made it that much more stable.
I'd think that The Earth would have had atleast just as many impacts
Originally posted by Stratrf_Rus
The closer proximity to the Sun makes the ratio of Earth to Mars increase.
I don't think proximity to that belt would have the effect since there is a wider or larger area Mars covers in a given time and so greater possibility for misses, such as the Sun theoretically gobbles up all asteroids that are astray ... with time.
Originally posted by iori_komei
The moon is as scarred as it is because it does'nt have active
geologic processes.