posted on Aug, 23 2006 @ 08:43 AM
So its Aug 23rd now, and nothing significant happened. The Iranians delivered their multi part response which the U.N. leaders are all examining, the
Syrians were talking tuff about possible conflict with Israel if Israel oversteps boundaries in an interview. Syra feels enboldened at the moment due
to Hizbollahs "phyrric victory"
So the only things that could make sense would be if that response by Iran resulted in some kind of war in the near future, ie; within 8 months of
this post, maybe up to 12.
The second thing that would make sense would be if Syria eventually attacked Israel at some point to regain Golan Heights(they'd claim Israel
attacked 1st), even though Israeli ministers have gone to Damascus to negiotiate another "land for peace" deal with Syrian president, like the one
that failed in Gaza Strip, showing that Israel feels a bit weaker in it's regional stance now, imo.. just a bit.
I look at prophecies as thus: It doesn't mean that on the date you've recieved, or discovered, or formulated, or however you came up with the date
isn't correct in the prophecy, it might mean that something went into effect, an action that will cause reactions much like dominos knocked over in a
row until some time in the future when the perverbial "seeds" which were planted on the prophecy date "bloom" to fruition and the actual attack or
loss of life or whatever prophecised actually happens.
For the record I didnt think anyone was going to start a war with anybody else on the 22nd. I expected a fiery speech from the Iranian president in
utter defiance which we didnt quite get, in fact Iran is acting like they honestly might want to negotiate on some sort of better terms, as said in
their response. So even I, thinking something non violent and .. basicly not that big of a blip on the radar would happen, am incorrect as well. I
guess.
Damn these dates .. stupid prophecies.. meh meh *kicks prophecy book across room*
[edit on 23-8-2006 by runetang]