It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
Whoever made this up needs to stop taking crack, not even the pentagon had missile protection. Where would these missles be, noone ever saw them, and where would the helicopter be based at?
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
Why are you even considering this? The WTC towers were private property, they would have to break laws to get missles and attack helicopters. No company could ever justify the cost, and must I repeat, not even the pentagon had missles or helicopters protecting it. The idea that a privately own building would have military grade equipment protecting it and have to pay for the missles and helicopters, upkeep on them, and the personel to man them, it's just a retarded notion.
Why should it be military grade equipment, remember who are tenants, Federal trade bank in national overseas precious metal reserves, stock market, CIA, FBI, NSA, Federal Contractors, World NEWS, AMerica Free Radio,.
As you have stated but have not included no company could ever justify the cost. so is cost of the protection system the reason you think its a hoax.
You keep infeering twcs are private building but they are not federal port authority equals us government. You call this a retarded notion yet you post no proof except your personnel opinion which is lacking of information and direction.
"I Don't Buy It" " I was one of the first tenants in the World Trade Center (WTC) back in 1979. Back then----over 20 years ago----it was known to all the tenants of the WTC that the WTC was a "no fly" zone. If you came within 12 miles of the WTC, flying outside of a pattern where you were supposed to be, you were warned to back off. If you came within five miles, they would threaten to shoot you down. If you came within three miles, they could shoot you down. If I remember correctly, on the roof of tower No. 2 they had surface to air missiles for that purpose, plus also the Spatz helicopters for that purpose. "I had a friend who was flying a small plane who got warned away and they almost blew him out of the sky 20 years ago because he was showing somebody a close view of the towers. "I can see the first tower getting hit by surprise, but 15 minutes later the second tower also gets hit? I don't buy it." Walter Burien, Radio Free America, Nov 11, 2001
Originally posted by mondegreen
Not sure what your talking about AIM64C, Since some witness reported events from the Woolworth buildings. Why would you state that missiles hit the building when 6 billion people have seen planes strike the towers.
TESTIMONY OF ALAN REISS BEFORE THE
NATIONAL COMMISSION ON TERRORIST ATTACKS UPON THE UNITED STATES
May 18, 2004.
Thank you Chairman Kean, Vice Chairman Hamilton and distinguished members
of the Commission for the opportunity to testify before you today. My name is Alan
Reiss and I am currently the Deputy Director of Aviation at The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Prior to assuming my current position, I was the Director of the agency’s World Trade Department, which operated the World Trade Center
Mr. Chairman, on the morning of 9/11, I was on the World Trade Center
Concourse when the first plane hit. I responded immediately to the World Trade Center Police Desk, which was in the immediate vicinity on the plaza level and was told that the police had a report that a missile had been fired at the World Trade Center from the Woolworth building.