MORE ON THE FOX NEWS WTC UFO VIDEO
Here is another segment of the tv special by FOX News featuring the
famous pre 9/11 WTC ufo video.
www.youtube.com...
To my knowledge the original footage was released by the SCI-FI
Channel in 2000. After the 9/11 events the SCI-FI Channel removed
the video from their website. According to the original letter Barbara S
asked the SCI-FI for an offer ($$) for the video and the story.
In subsequent emails Barbara S complained the SCI-fI Channel posted
her video without paying her the rights and awakened a big controversy
wich angered her. The SCI-FI Channel kept silent to these demands.
As time passed by Barbara S appeared again now saying the ufo video
was a CGI animation made by the SCI-FI Channel as promotional
advertisement. The SCI-FI Channel never made any statement regarding the footage.
Sometime later FOX News features the WTC ufo footage in a tv special
without mentioning this video may be a fake. The question arises.
In order to air the WTC ufo video Fox News would had to pay for the rights to the video's owner.
But who is the owner ? The SCI-FI Channel ? Why would the SCI-FI Channel want to sale
their own promotional advertisement footage to FOX News wich is their competitor.
Why would FOX News want to pay for a SCI-FI Channel promotional footage to be featured in
a FOX News tv special specially knowing this video is a fake surrounded by a big controversy ?
Does'nt make any sense.
But what if the SCI-FI Channel is not the real owner but Barbara S according to the original story ?
It seems Miss Sicuranza had certain motives to go public breaking the ethic code revealing she was hired
by the SCI-FI Channel as an actress to perform as the witness in the promotional, a job in wich she must
have been paid and surely there must be a contract with the SCI-FI Channel signed by her releasing her rights
to appear on television as a legal requirement in these matters.
To my knowledge Barbara S would have been the subject of a legal sue by the SCI-FI Channel for breaking
the terms of a contract and other legal issues. Unless there is another side of the story and Barbara S did'nt
tell the whole truth.
Perhaps Barbara is indeed the actual owner of the footage as she claimed initially. Perhaps Barbara made
a new deal now with FOX News selling the rights for good money and under certain conditions.
One thing is sure. FOX News paid for the rights to broadcast the WTC ufo footage.
But to who ?