It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xmotex
I know I'm probably wasting my time, but you can't expect purely scriptural arguments to carry any weight with non-Christians. You might as well be quoting from a phone book.
Originally posted by Muaddib
The president of Iran has called once again for the removal of Israel, but this time he used the Arabic word "ezaleh", which means to permanently remove body hairs, or a woman's virginity. He called on all Arab states to help "isolate the artificial product of Islam's enemies, and also warned any and all countries that support Israel before it is too late, because he states that it won't take long before a terrible explosion would wipe Israel from the map, which he calls the Zionist entity.
Originally posted by billybob
Originally posted by golemina
depleted uranium is just one of the 'freindly's planting the seeds of another generational wave of bipolar feudalism.
Oh stop with the depleted uranium stuff... ITS DEPLETED. Its also used in tank armor.
Not exactly smart to wrap your soldiers in material that would kill them after years of training in it. Its more propaganda then anything.
posted by subz
Even by the CIA's own estimates, Iran is at least a decade away from devising a nuclear weapon. But don’t let that stop your orgy of panic and paranoia.
Originally posted by subz
Oh I agree, ive written many a post on ATSNN regarding such a topic. I've maintained all along that the best way to a secure World is for all nations to have atomic weapons instead of only a handful. Lets face it, the MAD doctrine works. Israel having nukes whilst their enemies dont is more conducive to nuclear weapons being used. If Iran had nukes the likelihood of nukes being used drops to nil.
Originally posted by subz
But my statement above was in response to the apocalyptic drivel that some how equated President Ahmadinejad to the anti-Christ who wants to (and has the means) of bringing destruction to the entire World. I interpreted that as a reference to the supposed nuclear weapons program Iran is meant to have. By all accounts they are years away from that so that users call to get everything done you wanted to do soon because we're all gonna die is premature at best.
Originally posted by donwhite
Me for one says if atom bombs are good for Pakistan and if atom bombs are good for India and if atom bombs are good for Israel, then atom bombs are good for Iran for sure and for North Korea maybe.
posted by American Madman
posted by donwhite
“ . . if atom bombs are good for Pakistan and India and Israel, then atom bombs are good for Iran and North Korea . . [Edited by Don W]
Who said they are good for any of those countries? Israel only so they have a deterrent against a bunch of countries trying to gang up on them AGAIN . . [Edited by Don W]
If Israel was going to use them wipe out their enemies they would have already . . Whereas Iran no doubt has no problem giving a nuke to a terrorist group which would use them.