I thought I'd get your thoughts on this, since it seems to be totally unexplainable outside of controlled demolition, and seems a solid argument, but
isn't an argument I see very often, or have seen made by any member of your organization so far (correct me if I'm mistaken).
When WTC2 first began its collapse sequence, as I'm sure you're aware, and before it began its strictly vertical collapse, it tilted outwards
something like 15 degrees.
But if you watch a video (such as this one
) of its collapse,
and trace the top's movement, you'll notice that within a couple of seconds, the tilting suddenly stops, despite nothing being in the way of the
great mass of tilting upper floors.
Well, according to the law of conservation of angular
(link included for lay ATS members), the upper floors should have continued tilting outwards unless there was some equal and opposite
force exerted on the upper floors (which there clearly was not), or unless the pivot for this angular momentum was destroyed
So it would seem that, for the official story to be true, the collapsing floors of WTC2 would have to have been crushing the floors below without
. If they touched, there would be a pivot for the upper floors, and the tilting via conservation of angular momentum would continue.
This would be a blatant paradox for official theory.
For demolition theory, this seems to only indicate that some explosive event(s) physically separated the structure of a whole floor from everything
above it in pretty much a single instant.
I think Jim Hoffman is the only person I've seen to make this argument, and Dr. Jones appears to mention something similar in his paper only in
passing. Do you think this is something worth pursuing in your organization's investigation, or is there anything you would add or subtract to/from
[edit on 2-7-2006 by bsbray11]