It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mouth
The main problem with this whole "planet" thing, is that there is no absolute definition of the term "planet." Apparently, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) will be releasing its final decision on the matter of defining what a planet is in September 2006.
Originally posted by imbalanced
What about its shape ?
There are lots of rocks orbiting the sun but the are not round ?
wouldnt this sugest that it formed at the same time as the rest
of our solar system ? all of those other rocks look like muntant
potatoes ! yet pluto is perfectly round.
Originally posted by imbalanced
What about it being made the same time as our own ?
The shape would sugest this. Also if it turns out to be
a large floating glob of nothing then it shouldnt be a planet.
Originally posted by andy1033
you would think that a planet should at least have some sort of atmosphere.
Originally posted by enaught
OF course the gas giants have atmospheres and surfaces.
Originally posted by puneetsg
About the surface part, could you provide me with some links on that. I dont think i have ever come accros anything that stated the gas giants as having a surface (we are talking about solid surface right?). Thanks
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
It's never been proven, becuase we lack the capabilities of sending probes so far down there, but it has been hypothesized.