posted on Jun, 16 2006 @ 11:55 AM
Please take your time to read this, it is only a theory but i strongly believe it has credibility. I haven't found this through research, it's all
purely what I believe. Apologies for such a long post!
Time doesn't exist, only here on earth. It is measured by the revolutions of the planet. Therefore, in deep space, there is nothing to measure the
time and even if there was, it wouldn't be the same as here on earth. On other planets where there is life, time would be measured differently
according to the mechanics of that specific planet. So if a planet that supported life was discovered 10million light years away, we might only be
5million L/yrs away from the other planets perception. So it would take twice as long for us to reach them as it would for them to reach us right?
However this would make no difference to us because it would be measured by our time. If you take time out of the equation we could theoretically
arrive in 'no time' whichever method we used to get there. This wouldnt mean we could get there instantly, just that there was no time to be
measured during the journey.
From this, I have thought that maybe if time doesn't exist in space, then the age of the universe is not 'however many' billions of years old but
either infinitely long or an infinitely short snapshot or a pause where time stands still in which we exist. This could mean that the world we live in
is living in this timeless vacuum with no beginning and no end, just the present.
We measure space distance in light years, how far light travels in a year. Away from the restrictions of time, could there be some other way of
getting to the places where ET life exists without the necessity of time travel?
Ive posted a thread before, but i cant find it, on the theory of life on this planet. I believe that the universe has always existed and always will
exist in an infinite loop. Life on Earth has come from other parts of the universe where life was forced away from its habitat in the same way that
humans will at some point. Theyre not all from the same planet either and have brought whole ecosystems with them due to the need for food and
reproduction of plant life. This explains the diversity of life on the planet.
Humans have become the most dominant race on the planet and are so naive that they believe that the diversity of life is down to a divine being or
evolution (no offence to religious people). Neanderthals were another type of human life from a different planet to our species. We are the more
dominant and killed them off becaue we couldnt live together. We didnt evolve from them. Species that have become extinct on earth have died off
because they are unable to survive in earths conditions. Some have been purposely wiped out to make way for new species, as in the case of the
dinosours. They were destroyed by nuclear blast which was followed by a nuclear winter. As the ice age thawed, new and existing species (including
humans) were able to thrive without the threat of dinosours, which had become the most dominant and life threatening race on Earth.
Hopefully, someday, we will work out the true timeline of our background and realise before we are wiped out in the same way to make way for a new
race. The human population needs to pull together to find a way to get to other habitable planets and stop wasting time and money fighting amongst
eachother before its too late.
Religion restricts our mind's potential and without it, we would be free to work out the truth. Science speculates and makes assumptions based on
what is already known. This leads people into a false sense of their surroundings. The truth really IS out there but we need to open up our eyes and
minds and start looking for it and not going along with what we already know.
Fiftyfifty