Sending in a machine in place of a soldier is probably cheaper.
yes you are right it would be.Lets think about this for a moment.how much is the average soldier worth,guns ammo,body armour,and all equitment per
soldier.Its probley a far bit right few thousand for sure.And in combat at anytime this soldier can be killed all it takes is one bullet and hes dead
no longer a fighting unite,and on top that his fellow soldiers have to collect his body.
Chances are well 1 or 2 guys are running out in the open to grab there commrad one of them will be hit or even both in witch case you now have
multipul casuties (sorry i cant spell to good) more soldiers not able to fight over all you have less combat units now and thousands of dollers worth
of equitment layiing onthe ground.All from a few bullets.correct? yes.
Now look at it this way in my example 3 men are allready dead 2 because theay tryed to help there friend.Now lets say the squad containes 15 men 3
dead now so 12 left.You now have 12 men to take out the enemy in this example we will say the enemy is in a neighbor hood 1 city block big in
buildings (like baghdad or somthing)
Now the enemy numbers ine 25 men agenst 12.so far the enemy is winning.now when the american soldiers move in to try to kill the enemy how many more
will theay loose? lets say 4 more (randomrpg attack) now 8 left and you have 7 unites dead and 8 american soldiers spred out looking for enemy.
each soldier has chance of being killed like the others.right? yes.Now if you take the amount of money that it cost for 15 soldiers
guns,ammo,equitment,monthley pay ect. and add a little more...well maybe alot more and you build 3 or 4 robots.
Send in the robots.When one gets hit IF it is distroyed then the others keep fighting theay dont pick it up theay dont become casuilitys and becaue
theay are machines theay can be programed to be smarter.theay can hold more strong armour better weapons and better sence of where the enemy is much
greater weapons handling and can take more of a beating then humans.
it can take 1 bullet to kill a human being just 1 then hes dead money lost in the govermints eyes.With robots you spend little more money but you
have less unites but the unites you do have are stronger and more better then the humans.because robots ahve more advantages then people.
When robot is distroyed you can eather try to repair it if possable or make new one no life lost.If the robots are strong enough then theay are
worth the money and can be used in smaller ammounts as i said 3 robots compaired to 15 soldiers.
Sure it costs money to repair them and to mantaine them and to build them but it cost money to feed soldiers it coset money to pay them! to keep
them in good health to keep them hydrated (water) cost money to transposrt them in large numbers.
Robots dont need food or water theay dont need beds and houseing like humans do.In the end its cheeper to use a few robots rather then a lot of
people.Pople can fly jets and use tanks but foot soldiers as robots makes more sence.
Robots dont hestaite eather when it comes down to it theay no wut to do and theay do it.As long as people controll them yes! people must allways
controll them and theay must never be able to think for them selves.
Some of you may not agree some of you may.I think it is smart to make them and to use them personley i think it would be best to use them with
human soldiers but thats just me.
sorry for all the bad spelling lol