It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

They seriously want us to believe this is authentic??!

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:03 AM
link   
A part of me really wants to believe that al-Quesadilla in Iraq would draft a situation report that reads like a CIA analysis. But seriously? Are we really to believe this document was found in a safe house?

How convenient that al-Zarqawi thought that the LONGER we stayed in Iraq, the worse it would be for them.

Anyway, don't take it from me, read it yourself....

Text of al-Zarqawi Safe-House Document
Jun 15 8:58 AM US/Eastern

By The Associated Press
Text of a document discovered in terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's


hideout. The document was provided in English by Iraqi National


Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie:

___

The situation and conditions of the resistance in Iraq have reached a point that requires a review of the events and of the work being done inside Iraq. Such a study is needed in order to show the best means to accomplish the required goals, especially that the forces of the National Guard have succeeded in forming an enormous shield protecting the American forces and have reduced substantially the losses that were solely suffered by the American forces. This is in addition to the role, played by the Shi'a (the leadership and masses) by supporting the occupation, working to defeat the resistance and by informing on its elements.

As an overall picture, time has been an element in affecting negatively the forces of the occupying countries, due to the losses they sustain economically in human lives, which are increasing with time. However, here in Iraq, time is now beginning to be of service to the American forces and harmful to the resistance for the following reasons:

1. By allowing the American forces to form the forces of the National Guard, to reinforce them and enable them to undertake military operations against the resistance.

2. By undertaking massive arrest operations, invading regions that have an impact on the resistance, and hence causing the resistance to lose many of its elements.

3. By undertaking a media campaign against the resistance resulting in weakening its influence inside the country and presenting its work as harmful to the population rather than being beneficial to the population.

4. By tightening the resistance's financial outlets, restricting its moral options and by confiscating its ammunition and weapons.

5. By creating a big division among the ranks of the resistance and jeopardizing its attack operations, it has weakened its influence and internal support of its elements, thus resulting in a decline of the resistance's assaults.

6. By allowing an increase in the number of countries and elements supporting the occupation or at least allowing to become neutral in their stand toward us in contrast to their previous stand or refusal of the occupation.

7. By taking advantage of the resistance's mistakes and magnifying them in order to misinform.

Based on the above points, it became necessary that these matters should be treated one by one:

1. To improve the image of the resistance in society, increase the number of supporters who are refusing occupation and show the clash of interest between society and the occupation and its collaborators. To use the media for spreading an effective and creative image of the resistance.

2. To assist some of the people of the resistance to infiltrate the ranks of the National Guard in order to spy on them for the purpose of weakening the ranks of the National Guard when necessary, and to be able to use their modern weapons.

3. To reorganize for recruiting new elements for the resistance.

4. To establish centers and factories to produce and manufacture and improve on weapons and to produce new ones.

5. To unify the ranks of the resistance, to prevent controversies and prejudice and to adhere to piety and follow the leadership.

6. To create division and strife between American and other countries and among the elements disagreeing with it.




posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:04 AM
link   
7. To avoid mistakes that will blemish the image of the resistance and show it as the enemy of the nation.

In general and despite the current bleak situation, we think that the best suggestions in order to get out of this crisis is to entangle the American forces into another war against another country or with another of our enemy force, that is to try and inflame the situation between American and Iraq or between America and the Shi'a in general.

Specifically the Sistani Shi'a, since most of the support that the Americans are getting is from the Sistani Shi'a, then, there is a possibility to instill differences between them and to weaken the support line between them; in addition to the losses we can inflict on both parties. Consequently, to embroil America in another war against another enemy is the answer that we find to be the most appropriate, and to have a war through a delegate has the following benefits:

1. To occupy the Americans by another front will allow the resistance freedom of movement and alleviate the pressure imposed on it.

2. To dissolve the cohesion between the Americans and the Shi'a will weaken and close this front.

3. To have a loss of trust between the Americans and the Shi'a will cause the Americans to lose many of their spies.

4. To involve both parties, the Americans and the Shi'a, in a war that will result in both parties being losers.

5. Thus, the Americans will be forced to ask the Sunni for help.

6. To take advantage of some of the Shia elements that will allow the resistance to move among them.

7. To weaken the media's side which is presenting a tarnished image of the resistance, mainly conveyed by the Shi'a.

8. To enlarge the geographical area of the resistance movement.

9. To provide popular support and cooperation by the people.

The resistance fighters have learned from the result and the great benefits they reaped, when a struggle ensued between the Americans and the Army of Al-Mahdi. However, we have to notice that this trouble or this delegated war that must be ignited can be accomplished through:

1. A war between the Shi'a and the Americans.

2. A war between the Shi'a and the secular population (such as Ayad 'Alawi and al-Jalabi.)

3. A war between the Shi'a and the Kurds.

4. A war between Ahmad al-Halabi and his people and Ayad 'Alawi and his people.

5. A war between the group of al-Hakim and the group of al-Sadr.

6. A war between the Shi'a of Iraq and the Sunni of the Arab countries in the gulf.

7. A war between the Americans and Iraq. We have noticed that the best of these wars to be ignited is the one between the Americans and Iran, because it will have many benefits in favor of the Sunni and the resistance, such as:

1. Freeing the Sunni people in Iraq, who are (30 percent) of the population and under the Shi'a Rule.

2. Drowning the Americans in another war that will engage many of their forces.

3. The possibility of acquiring new weapons from the Iranian side, either after the fall of Iran or during the battles.

4. To entice Iran towards helping the resistance because of its need for its help.

5. Weakening the Shi'a supply line.

The question remains, how to draw the Americans into fighting a war against Iran? It is not known whether American is serious in its animosity towards Iraq, because of the big support Iran is offering to America in its war in Afghanistan and in Iraq. Hence, it is necessary first to exaggerate the Iranian danger and to convince America and the west in general, of the real danger coming from Iran, and this would be done by the following:

1. By disseminating threatening messages against American interests and the American people and attribute them to a Shi'a Iranian side.

2. By executing operations of kidnapping hostages and implicating the Shi'a Iranian side.



posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:04 AM
link   
3. By advertising that Iran has chemical and nuclear weapons and is threatening the west with these weapons.

4. By executing exploding operations in the west and accusing Iran by planting Iranian Shi'a fingerprints and evidence.

5. By declaring the existence of a relationship between Iran and terrorist groups (as termed by the Americans).

6. By disseminating bogus messages about confessions showing that Iran is in possession of weapons of mass destruction or that there are attempts by the Iranian intelligence to undertake terrorist operations in America and the west and against western interests.

Let us hope for success and for God's help.



posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:09 AM
link   
Do not "mis-underestimate" the abilities of Islamic terrorist. These are not "dumb" desert dwellers............western arrogance has allowed them to strike fear far too many times.



posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:15 AM
link   
I'm not saying Islamic terrorists aren't capable of analysis, I'm saying this "white paper" almost too conveniently lists out the allegations the U.S. has stated about al-Qaeda.

This isn't the first time as well. There have been a handful of times when the president has said al-Qaeda is doing this or that, and within days we see a video or a document stating that al-Qaeda is doing just that.......



posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by dirkthedaringinatl
This isn't the first time as well. There have been a handful of times when the president has said al-Qaeda is doing this or that, and within days we see a video or a document stating that al-Qaeda is doing just that.......


Just to play devil's advocate. Could it be that our intellegence is actually working and we state that they are doing this or that and they actually are? I do believe it to be just more coincidences that surround this whole war on terror......coincidence after coincidence after..etc.



posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 09:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Griff

Originally posted by dirkthedaringinatl
This isn't the first time as well. There have been a handful of times when the president has said al-Qaeda is doing this or that, and within days we see a video or a document stating that al-Qaeda is doing just that.......


Just to play devil's advocate. Could it be that our intellegence is actually working and we state that they are doing this or that and they actually are? I do believe it to be just more coincidences that surround this whole war on terror......coincidence after coincidence after..etc.


You may entirely be correct, and that would be a great change to the history of our intel performance in the past. At the same time, there is a skunk works smell to this. I'm not saying that's wrong of intel to do such things -- play up how we're actually winning in the media. It just doesn't pass my smell test.

As a former reporter, I hate to feel like the media is being used. But you gotta report what the government tells you. I just hope the AP or some other news agency digs a little deeper into the "treasure trove" evidence.....



posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 12:20 PM
link   
A lot of Al-Queda's leadership, those that remain from its formation back in the '80's are very well educated, as media savvy as any Western politician could dream of being.

It really doesn't surprise me that it would read like it does.



posted on Jun, 16 2006 @ 10:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by dirkthedaringinatl
I'm not saying Islamic terrorists aren't capable of analysis, I'm saying this "white paper" almost too conveniently lists out the allegations the U.S. has stated about al-Qaeda.

So that means its fake? What if it means.....the US allegations are true???


There have been a handful of times when the president has said al-Qaeda is doing this or that, and within days we see a video or a document stating that al-Qaeda is doing just that.......

perhaps thats because they are doing just that???



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join