It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
The Declaration of Independence had no legal force to nullify, and therefore no language to that effect was necessary. As for the one part of it with legal force, the Constitution did not nullify that, as we remain independent from Great Britain.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
What the Constitution did nullify -- and interestingly, it contains no language to that effect -- was the Articles of Confederation. The circumstances of the Constitution's implementation is an interesting topic in itself, but quite wide of the mark of the present discussion.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
No. I don't agree. It's an opinion. How many times must this be said? There may be some truth in there (Bush is a war president) but it's still an opinion. What the reader expects/believes/perceives is entirely up to them.
Too bad. Everyone is entitled to have and express their opinion. It's a Constitutional right. Highest law in the land. People can handle being hurt. I handle it. you handle it. Everyone can handle it. It's part of life.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If you read about slander, then you know what you're saying is untrue. An opinion isn't slander. Whether you believe it's an opinion or not.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
In this post you're using definitions and principles, maybe. You've been all over the place as regards the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, morals, civility... I'm totally lost.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
But for the great diversionary tactic. I can't help but notice you use this tactic in most of your 'debates'.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
By the way, I'm not talking about state laws either.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I have. And I have told you what it looks like, what I would do, what I would expect and how I would feel. I have answered every question you have asked, even if I don't see the significance.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Yes, I see the difference. Welcome to life! We ALL conform to our environment.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
We all make choices based on what we think the outcome will be. Welcome to reality.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
This debate was really enjoyable for me for the first 6 pages or so, but your diversionary tactics, your refusal to acknowledge basic tenets, your negation of certain analogies while embracing others, your refusal to talk about your personal opinions on religion while bombarding me with questions about my personal feelings and how I would feel in certain situations and your constant changing of viewpoints and positions has made the last few exchanges not only unenjoyable, but downright painful and unpleasant.
Originally posted by saint4God
I have no problem with people expressing their opinion. This is not the issue.
Originally posted by saint4God
The author should simply write, "it is my opinion that he is a war monger" rather than try to prove this point by a slanderous falsehood.
…
I think there is the expectation that there's an "underlying truth" in a poli/personal cartoon.
…
The direct falsehood is easy to establish. The underlying accusation cause additional harm.
…
Can you candidly tell me you have never been influence in opinion or fact by a political/personal cartoon?
Originally posted by saint4God
I'd be happy to repeat or rephrase anything that was unclear.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
What Constitutional right do political cartoons infringe upon?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Will you support the eradication of religious expression as strongly as you support the eradication of political cartoons?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
How does a political cartoon infringe upon the rights of liberty and the pursiut of happiness given to people by their Creator?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
what 'harm' do these cartoons inflict? How do these chararacter drawings that exaggerate and poke fun at public figures actually 'hurt' them or their family?
Originally posted by saint4God
It seems you sitll do not feel or see where your rights are being violated...
Originally posted by saint4God
I figured it would be inconsiderate to leave any questions or issues unanswered
Originally posted by saint4God
Also, I apologize for making you feel pain and unpleasantness, that was not my intent.