It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In terms of badness:
1) TV is very bad
2) Newspapers are better
3) Radio is very very good in comparison to TV
But it brings up the question: why are some media outlets so very much more successful than others?
It isn't advertising, because advertising follows the consumer. And the consumer is following the successful radio personalities. Why are the consumers tuning in?
Originally posted by xmotex
But it brings up the question: why are some media outlets so very much more successful than others?
Because what appeals to the lowest common denominator gets the highest ratings, and sells the most advertising?
It isn't advertising, because advertising follows the consumer. And the consumer is following the successful radio personalities. Why are the consumers tuning in?
Because lame jokes about lesbians and farts (and farting lesbians even) appear to be irrisitably entertaining to that aforementioned lowest common denominator?
Psychos eating orphans sell more papers and get higher ratings than saints feeding orphans. The fact that they're creating an increasingly fearful (and thus inevitably authoritarian) society doesn't even play into their calculations, nor does left/right politics.
Lowest common denominator, or majority of people? And this is wrong, why exactly?
I didn't think we were talking about Howard Stern here.
You definitely listen to different radio than I do.
Originally posted by xmotex
Well, bringing up talk radio, it's hard to ignore Stern and his imitators. They have a huge share of the market.
I realize you're trying to steer the conversation towards the fact that Air America has failed to light the world on fire (a popular Right talking point), but I simply dont care... it seems to me that political talk radio is a format that appeals inherently more to the right, just as entertainment talk radio seems to appeal to those that still derive their joys from lowbrow toilet humour.
So the next time you are debating someone over a point, or issue, don't automatically assume they are of the opposite political party.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Jsobecky, a personal question is how old are you?
Growing up in recent times I can assure you that people id say under 30 maybe 25 dont care at all about the issues anymore. I think thats going to continue unlike previous generations where they would mature. My generation has a feeling of hopelessness, and dont care about anything. They are aware of it happening, comprehend it, and could care less. We are growing up in a different age, and news is changing. They are gearing us to slowly but steadily downplay real issues and make us focus on things that dont matter.
Truth is, the people at the top dont want anything to be solved, so just dont broadcast it. A large majority of my generation arent going to bother voting this upcoming president election (2008). They dont care about it in the slightest. This is about 7-8 out of 10 kids i talk to. Things are looking grim, since people my age care less and less, especially since they know exactly whats going on.
Things are looking grim, since people my age care less and less, especially since they know exactly whats going on.