Facinating Laser warfare article, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 19-10-2003 @ 09:49 PM by Netchicken
www.oaklandtribune.com...

As an offshoot, few in the Pentagon are grappling with the implications of highly mobile laser forces:

Are military computers and commanders ready for entirely automated weapons that deliver instant, lethal blasts of energy and can be retargeted in seconds? Lasers under testing for air defense already offer that capability. Fully automated firing on offensive targets is a short step behind.

"When you develop the capability to track, target and destroy something in a second, then the temptation to remove humans from the decision cycle becomes very great," said Loren Thompson, chief operating officer at the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Va.-based defense think tank.

Will U.S. forces fire lasers on humans? International treaty forbids the use of lasers for blinding people. But there is no legal ban on striking humans. U.S. Special Operations Command wants to load a medium-power laser alongside artillery and miniguns on a future version of the AC-130 gunships that since Vietnam have been a mainstay of special forces attacks on ground targets. The laser's power could blow tires and ignite gas tanks, but wouldn't be lethal for tanks or armored vehicles.

"It would be a very long-range, ultra-accurate sniper rifle," suggests John Pike, a weapons expert and director of GlobalSecurity.org.


reply posted on 20-10-2003 @ 12:33 AM by intelgurl
Originally posted by MKULTRA

Sounds like there has been some pretty significant technology developed in secret for the past few years!

Or is this another "Star Wars" ploy?

Originally posted by Netchicken
I think that they are 'leaking' the information to prepare people for when it comes out. Also I imagine that the tech we read of is old enough, or vaguly described enough, to be safe to release.


MKULTRA is correct - there have been great technical strides in the past decade. And Netchicken is also correct in his assumption that the defense industry / DoD leak information out about secret technologies that are being transferred into the mainstream military deployment.

My job has me working in one of the peripheral areas of military aviation and I can assure you, (although without proof or reffering to specifics) that this is standard operating procedure for these guys.

In fact - I posted the following in one of the other discussion threads, but it would apply here too:

If "they" say that a new technology is being examined - it is quite probably a technology being pulled out of the black.

If "they" say that something is being researched then chances are a g.i. deployment version under development.

If "they" say something is under development then chances are there is a working copy(ies) being tested.

If "they" say something is being tested then there is probably at least one operational squadron ready for orders. (referring to aircraft)

If "they" say something is being researched, developed or tested and then you hear no more about it - then you've got something that has gone super-black. Usually when an offshoot technology is discovered that has far reaching possibilities or implications.

intelgurl
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Sno-Trains..A short History..(with short video)
  Posted 15 days ago with 16 member flags
Pictures: Civil War Sub H.L. Hunley Finally Revealed
  Posted 9 days ago with 5 member flags
Neuroscience the new face of warfare: experts
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Congress Passes Bill That Opens US Skies To Unmanned Drones
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
The Latest in Terminator Tech
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags
U.S. Navy to test 32 megajoule EM Railgun in the coming weeks
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags