Congrats to wolfofwar for making the entry. I am reworking some of it. Anyone can feel free to edit my edits of course.

I just have to say that a lot of the information in the entry is relatively inaccurate, such as their worshipping lucifer (and contradictory, as they also are atheist in the article?). So, apologies upfront, no disprespect intended to wolfofwar.

...and while you were doing that I've been doing the same thing, and just spent some time splicing my edits in. Hope you like the changes, I tried to work around your additions.

And Umbrax, I know what you mean. Frankly I'm embarrassed by some of our pages but I don't have nearly enough time to put in the work required. I spent most of the evening doing just this one page... and it's not exactly encyclopaedic in its scope as it is.

[edit on 15-5-2006 by rich23]

Thanks guys.
This page looking much better now.

I just added the heading "Illuminati Researchers/Theorists." just to clean up the new heading. I also added a few internal links.

Things will grow as time progresses, the wikipedia was nothing at first, and it didn't grow to what it is beacuse of even a large group of dedicated individuals, it got that way because everyone out there contributes to it.


Tinwiki will progress the same way.

You guys did an awesome job on the page today. Rich, I awarded you 5,000 points for your efforts. Excellent work all around.

The wiki is just budding now, I believe in a year down the road we will look back and be very surprised at how far the site has come.

btw umbrax, we had discussed that the biggest thing now is getting articles that are good even if short, in order to spread out the base of the Tinwiki, but focusing on the most viewed page is definitly the way to go, whats the next most viewed page after the illuminati?

Thanks, William. Nice to be appreciated!

However... someone else got in and edited everything out...

The page is actually pretty good but a lot of stuff has gone missing. A very destructive edit. I tried to incorporate everything that had gone before in a non-destructive way. If we are to produce something that's different from the normal Wikipedia page (and I actually have my doubts about the wisdom of this) then there ought to be a policy of ensuring, where possible, that edits are non-destructive. The only change I made was to reduce the number of bloodline families to 13, because it seemed a stupid and obvious mistake to have more.

I don't even believe in all that dumb bloodline business, but I thought it was important for the site that it should be represented. THAT's how we differentiate ourselves from the conventional Wiki entry.

I took the time to produce a non-destructive edit. It would be good if other posters could, too.

I am an IDIOT. I clicked on the Wikipedia page.

Sincere, humble, (grovelling, even) apologies. And a VERY red face. I'm blushing to my roots

No worries.