|
|
Topic started on 15-5-2006 @ 01:20 PM by Umbrax
|
Following tinWiki's main page, the most viewed page on tinWiki is Illuminati.
As this is tinWiki’s most popular page it really needs to be a better representation of tinWiki.
Subjects surrounding the illuminati is one of my weak points in “ATS/tinWiki” subject matter. I don’t know much about it.
This page needs your help.
If you are knowledgable in this area, have a look at tinWiki's Getting started page
and the tinWiki Tutorial and see how you can contribute to this article.
Take a look at wikipedia's Illuminati page. It is almost 5 times the size of tinWiki's.
With the people posting on Illuminati subjects here on ATS everyday, the tinWiki Illuminati page should make Wikipedia's page look like a scribble on
a washroom wall.
If you think you can help, please feel free to add content. Just be sure to review tinWiki's
Getting started page and the tinWiki
Tutorial.
I will help in anyway I can. If you have questions about tinWiki feel free to contact me.
Thanks in advance for putting the effort into makeing this page great.
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more tinWiki.org Working Forum topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 15-5-2006 @ 03:20 PM by Nygdan
|
Congrats to wolfofwar for making the entry. I am reworking some of it. Anyone can feel free to edit my edits of course.
I just have to say that a lot of the information in the entry is relatively inaccurate, such as their worshipping lucifer (and contradictory, as they
also are atheist in the article?). So, apologies upfront, no disprespect intended to wolfofwar.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2006 @ 06:23 PM by rich23
|
...and while you were doing that I've been doing the same thing, and just spent some time splicing my edits in. Hope you like the changes, I tried
to work around your additions.
And Umbrax, I know what you mean. Frankly I'm embarrassed by some of our pages but I don't have nearly enough time to put in the work required. I
spent most of the evening doing just this one page... and it's not exactly encyclopaedic in its scope as it is.
[edit on 15-5-2006 by rich23]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2006 @ 06:33 PM by Umbrax
|
Thanks guys.
This page looking much better now  .
I just added the heading "Illuminati Researchers/Theorists." just to clean up the new heading. I also added a few internal links.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-5-2006 @ 06:38 PM by Nygdan
|
Things will grow as time progresses, the wikipedia was nothing at first, and it didn't grow to what it is beacuse of even a large group of dedicated
individuals, it got that way because everyone out there contributes to it.
Tinwiki will progress the same way.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2006 @ 08:08 PM by William One Sac
|
You guys did an awesome job on the page today. Rich, I awarded you 5,000 points for your efforts. Excellent work all around.
The wiki is just budding now, I believe in a year down the road we will look back and be very surprised at how far the site has come.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 15-5-2006 @ 09:48 PM by Nygdan
|
btw umbrax, we had discussed that the biggest thing now is getting articles that are good even if short, in order to spread out the base of the
Tinwiki, but focusing on the most viewed page is definitly the way to go, whats the next most viewed page after the illuminati?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-5-2006 @ 03:46 PM by Umbrax
|
tinwiki.org... opularpages
After illuminati it is Shadow people, thanks to last week's ATS weekly Newsletter.
[edit on 16/5/2006 by Umbrax]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-5-2006 @ 05:19 PM by rich23
|
Thanks, William. Nice to be appreciated!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-5-2006 @ 04:31 AM by rich23
|
However... someone else got in and edited everything out...
The page is actually pretty good but a lot of stuff has gone missing. A very destructive edit. I tried to incorporate everything that had gone
before in a non-destructive way. If we are to produce something that's different from the normal Wikipedia page (and I actually have my doubts about
the wisdom of this) then there ought to be a policy of ensuring, where possible, that edits are non-destructive. The only change I made was to reduce
the number of bloodline families to 13, because it seemed a stupid and obvious mistake to have more.
I don't even believe in all that dumb bloodline business, but I thought it was important for the site that it should be represented. THAT's how we
differentiate ourselves from the conventional Wiki entry.
I took the time to produce a non-destructive edit. It would be good if other posters could, too.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 17-5-2006 @ 08:28 AM by Umbrax
|
rich23, what is the distructive edit you are refering to?
tinwiki.org...
There was only one edit after yours and it was from me.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-5-2006 @ 12:40 PM by rich23
|
I am an IDIOT. I clicked on the Wikipedia page.
Sincere, humble, (grovelling, even) apologies. And a VERY red face. I'm blushing to my roots
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-5-2006 @ 12:43 PM by Umbrax
|
No worries.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |