It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
None of the 9mm, .45, or 5.56 Le Mas armor piercing bullet impacts over penetrated thoracic cavity or rear appendages of the animals while conventional duty ammunition did over penetrate the animals.
The Le Mas 5.56 AP bullet thoracic cavity tissue dissection additionally showed the heart of the hog, hard to the touch in areas that appeared not directly hit by the bullet fragments. There was obvious evidence of heart muscle hemorrhagic contusion (a severe bruise) which was not demonstrated from comparative point of impact current military 5.56 rifle ammunition designs. The Le Mas thoracic cavity handgun bullet impacts showed both small and large lung bullae (surface bubbles) that are usually only seen with a blast injury or high velocity rifle bullet fragmentations. The armor piercing, Limited Penetration 5.56 rounds performed as designed. They penetrated the 3/8th inch HAA armor yet still had expected effects in live target tissues (Figures 1-10). It was surprising to me to see the effects the rounds maintained after passing through armor plating. The effects were the same for handgun or rifle rounds; this keeps our military with comparable lethality if the transition to the sidearm is necessary. The overall safety of no passthrough during CQB operations should keep our troops safer during these challenging missions.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Does anyone know the AP capabilities of a blended metal bullet? If they are similar then the military should start using blended metal bullets, you get more bang of the buck and essentially guarantee a one shot kill. If not in rifles then defiantly in handguns, when you resort to your sidearm it usually means that every bullet counts, an instead of a 2 shot cluster you can have 17 fatal rounds.
Originally posted by Oblivions void
but due to Geneva convention dont expect to see this in wide military use if any.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
How about ballistic testing on rapists, or molesters? They are locked up till dead, right, they are not even considered to be human. Other wise they would not be in prison, for life. Got to figure out the over crowding right?
Inhumane as it sounds, is an eye for an eye, so blind after all?
That wasn't pushing the line was it?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Since when do we follow that? No, seriously, if your going to kill someone debating about the kind of bullet you’re going to sue is pointless.
Originally posted by Slaine01
Whether the rounds were tested on a slab of meat or a "live" target - the results would be the same. These kinds of "live" tests are more aimed at the marketing of the product than anything to do with scientific analysis.
Originally posted by Oblivions void
The limitation in ammunition due to the Geneva convention is almost archaic compare to what is available to SWAT teams and police forces through out the world, and that’s just the beginning of it, and for the last 20 or so years this treaty has served mostly as a tool to be used against us
have voted Oblivions void for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
Originally posted by Bibliophile
Weapons are interesting to be sure, but it would be nice if ATS would aspire to a higher standard of decency with respect to this sort of thing.
Originally posted by d1k
Originally posted by Bibliophile
Weapons are interesting to be sure, but it would be nice if ATS would aspire to a higher standard of decency with respect to this sort of thing.
As disgusting as it is it's better this be public then swept under the rug.
Originally posted by ch1466
...This wounding is neither worse nor less than what an M1 Garand rifle achieved as far back as the 40's with a 30.06 cartridge. While it is horrific, your own statement that 'weapons are interesting' is hypocritical...