Ok, not technically military nor a weapon but this seemed like the best fitting forum given the general nature of this technology.
Stealth as applied to vehicles I envision as being something like this-
combined with this-
In that the simplest way to maintain visual anonymity is to destroy the signature outlines within a block shape of entirely different form and
And the best way to extend this to secondary RF levels is to fit bluff secondary appliques (which may also function as armor) that more or less
eliminate body junctions, panel-joins and at least mask design elements like wheel well cutouts and engine venting behind deep-dielectric
Obviously, the ability to function without secondary audible propulsion noise (hybrid-electric drive) and in a terrain environment beyond that which
the threat can see-or-expect you (all terrain and masted sensors) 'helps a lot'.
Because you won't be stalked by lions in the arctic. And a foot wide mast 10ft above the horizon line certainly beats a 10ft wide grille and fenders
when the polar bears come looking for meat.
That said, the ultimate humiliation factor of cops and speedguns is that they force you to do in shame of being caught that which SHOULD BE a cry of
There being no fahrfugnugen factor when you are more worried about being caught than in finding out if you can physically master a vehicle at those
As such, why wish to go 100 in a 65 (I can tell you 70% of American roads, 80% of American suspensions and 90% of American drivers are not cut out for
But 200 in a 250?
Achieving a Real sense of speed is quite possible.
Because as soon as you demand to be allowed to do something /safely/; the 'reasons why' you are forbidden from the action must be dealt with as an
honest function of physics necessary to make the law inapplicable rather than 'skirted'.
Or Bra'd as the case may be.
Many high performance (low slung) vehicles of the mid 80's having adopted supposedly RAM-enhanced grill covers and mudprotectors before the
switchover to LIDAR based systems rendered X-Band protection more or less useless.
To which, I can only add that 'reflective' systems only work if they are in fact scatterers of immense non-linear return efficiency. Absorbers are
required to nullify Mie type speculars and I know of none which work reliably in laser bands at the linear distances typical of speed traps.
To defeat that kind of ambush-predator system, you almost need to go to a netcentric/cell countermeasure of automatic position tags based on passive
reception and rebro (a variant of the 'flashing lights' warning still extended occasionally as an illegal courtesy alert) notification.
This being less of a stealth-for-you. Than a stealth-defeat mechanism against them.