Mars face

Originally posted by Event Horizon
I think the shape of this object is not natural. The original picture clearly shows the face of something. The second picture looks completely different from the first. Plus it was taken with no shadows, which is good because you can see the U-shaped outline of the mountain, that clearly looks made or manufactured.

In general, it’s so frustrating to think that our government (US) is probably hiding something here. I just wish there was something we could do.

external image

Gotta agree with you there, even though the newer picture doesn't have the shadowing of the older one if you look closely you can still see the holes for the eyes the mouth and something protruding where the nose would be.

The overall shape at the base also looks manufactured as you stated.

How amazing would that be if the had a civilization just like ours on mars at one point perhaps millions of years ago. I think that would be huge incentive for the govt. to cover that up 2 exact civilizations living on planets that close. You would have to ask yourself how that could be and it would lend MAJOR credence to the alien populating planets hypothesis.

If it were true they would probably chose two or three of the planets most likely to suceed and then seed them and monitor them . Their could be a civilization in the galaxy speading themselves out over millions of years!! Amazing stuff!!

Woah , old thread.

You have to ask yourself, "if I never had seen the original Mars face would I have seen a face in the new photo?"

This is something that we call Matrixing. We tend to see faces in many things.


I've used this example before. cool pic...spirit guide?

Some people see a face here also.

We make faces out of things all the time. Here are more examples.






Just to get into the Mars face further...

Those are some cool pics Umbrax.

It surprises me no one has ever claimed they were the Virgin Mary. I get a kick out of the cheese sandwich sold on E-bay.

Originally posted by Umbrax

Nice pics, Umbrax. Thats a real looking profile of a face. I dont think I could draw a better profile than that one. You have to admit if you went to mars and saw this same picture above, you're first reaction would be wow that looks like a face. You would question yourself because it doesn't look natural. Right?

I see what your saying about things showing up in nature. All the pictures you posted, including the mars one, looked pretty natural.


[edit on 20-3-2005 by Event Horizon]

A lot of the time we have already decided on what we see before we even look.

I don't know how many pictures on ATS I've seen now that resemble faces but are really just examples of "Matrixing".
It is just like when we were little kids looking up at the clouds .

This applies to much more than just our vision.
For example we point at something we don't know and we say "Ghost" or "Alien". Usually the case will be that we just will never know. Instead of a Ghost maybe it's a transdimentional reflection. Instead of a Alien flying that UFO maybe it is us from the future.
When we deal with these things its fun to speculate what they are, but we should always look at the facts first. Instead of us jumping to the 'usual' conclusions, we need to ask what do we really know? Usually the answer is nothing .

Hey thanx umbrax for posting those pics, really puts things in perspective on the faces on mars.

Hey thanx umbrax for posting those pics, really puts things in perspective on the faces on mars.

I find it hilarious that every one focuses on the face in cydonia like they want you to, and totally look over everything else thats there they dont discuss or BRING UP TO YOU, such as....

The 3 pyramids
the ruins of a city
the spiral CARVED ramp up the mobieus mound
whatever else is there under the sand.....
just think what 2000 years of sand did to egypts artifacts....
how long has the sand been building up on mars?
see logs on mars on and under sand here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

heres some of my personal images from cydonia,
mars face:


Primitive mound on Earth built by ancient pryamid mound builders:


heres another on earth:


now for a birds eye look around the face:


closer in color:


closer in B & W:


closer into D & M pyramid in B & W:



More ancient city ruins:


ancient city ruins:



they just ignore these OTHER things.........

[edit on 20-3-2005 by lizzardsamok]

I'm not sure if this is old news or not, and I'm sorry to hijack this thread, but I only recently developed an interest for NASA's Mars explorations. I found this site- xfacts.com... that shows NASA is altering the photos of Mars to give us a sense that its a "dusty, red planet". Anyone have any more information on this?

Those are also some nice pics, LA. I will check out your thread when I have more time.

The angles on the pyramid are fasinating, but I remember a while back they determined the size of these ananolies to be huge. Do you have any dimensions? I think the face was like over a mile right? There have been alot of pictures from Mars being shown elsewhere, and without dimensions it is hard to analyze.

Originally posted by Umbrax
A lot of the time we have already decided on what we see before we even look.

I don't know how many pictures on ATS I've seen now that resemble faces but are really just examples of "Matrixing".
It is just like when we were little kids looking up at the clouds

.

This applies to much more than just our vision.
For example we point at something we don't know and we say "Ghost" or "Alien". Usually the case will be that we just will never know. Instead of a Ghost maybe it's a transdimentional reflection. Instead of a Alien flying that UFO maybe it is us from the future.
When we deal with these things its fun to speculate what they are, but we should always look at the facts first. Instead of us jumping to the 'usual' conclusions, we need to ask what do we really know? Usually the answer is nothing

.

Although you do bring up a good point about matrixing in nature it still does not disprove the face on mars, nor do any of the pictures we have seen of it prove anything.


The only thing we know is there is a structure that looks like a face (out in the middle of nowhere)we have evidence of other "interesting features" in the area of the structure and that's about it. Unless we did survelliance of the area it is still up for debate. It could be artificial, it could be natural.

I think it is also important to look at those rock formations you supplied and look at the surrounding a"ea there are rocks everywhere look around enough and you are bound to see something.

The "face" stands out b/c it is in the middle of nowhere just like the sphinx and pyramids of giza. There are also some stuctures around the face just like in giza, but if you look at the area as a "whole" the stuctures look out of place.

IMO they are unatural formations, I am not saying I am 100% sure they are, they could be natural but until the technology gets better or one of us goes their remains 2 possibilities.

If you look at this Link and to the left of the "face" there is a cluster of rocks that all look facelike. They could be faces of different alien types

Originally posted by pompano
Although you do bring up a good point about matrixing in nature it still does not disprove the face on mars, nor do any of the pictures we have seen of it prove anything.

I completely agree. I just prefer to be objective of these things first.
Perhaps once there are manned missions on Mars we will find undeniable evidence of civilization. That would be fantastic. To me the 'face' and everything else right now just look like rocks. I believe at this point you will see what you want to see. Looking at a web site that makes these things out to be artificial structures is still only speculation.
Someone can just as easily make a web site stating that Neptune is actually covered in Water.

It sure looks like water but it is actually the methane in Neptune's atmosphere that gives the blue appearance.

I must say these formations are much more beliveable than the ones I've seen claiming that there are snakes and hippos on Mars .

People are free to believe what they want to believe, but we shoulnd't buy into it just because someone made a flashy web site about it.

Originally posted by VirtualReality
I'm not sure if this is old news or not, and I'm sorry to hijack this thread, but I only recently developed an interest for NASA's Mars explorations. I found this site- xfacts.com... that shows NASA is altering the photos of Mars to give us a sense that its a "dusty, red planet". Anyone have any more information on this?

That dome in the crater looks like a mini-Epcot Center like the one at Disneyworld,

Thanks for the nice link. The outside of that ball inside the crater looks like the Epcot center in Florida. Some of those pictures make the planet look pretty hospitable. I’m sure NASA has a department for altering images. I have read somewhere that a person worked in such a place or was hired to consult. They came forward with information. Can’t remember any details unfortunately but maybe someone will post with some.


[edit on 20-3-2005 by Event Horizon]

Cydonia Mensae area is the vestige of an ancient civilization, plain and simple. Nature doesn't build pyramids.

No clue if this has been said... but

NATURE DOESN'T BUILD 5 SIDED PYRAMIDS!!!!

Don't tell me it's rocks either. We all know thats bull#. They are all symmetrical and about 1 mile long on each side.

Yo i think i read in a graham hancock book that the pic of the face close up was misplaced . Another pic was inserted to throw people off track.

Originally posted by VirtualReality
I'm not sure if this is old news or not, and I'm sorry to hijack this thread, but I only recently developed an interest for NASA's Mars explorations. I found this site- xfacts.com... that shows NASA is altering the photos of Mars to give us a sense that its a "dusty, red planet". Anyone have any more information on this?

This was a topic of heavy discussion here. A brief search should get you some answers, but this exclusive is still one of the most viewed ever. Also has some links to other threads, but amazing links to information. Kano did a wonderful job.

As for the face, you can search for that too, all over the place. Not a face as seen above.

I keep wondering why people are so ready to give 'the face' 'the door' when even casual reading on the topic should show how NASA as manipulated the evidence surround the topic to near death. It is rather obvious that they will try to destroy Hoagland's credibility right off the bat since they know most people are just too damn lazy to do the research and will just believe the most authoritive group when presented with situations their not really willing to investigate.

Here is some of the latest stuff on the 'face' from the enterprisemission

www.enterprisemission.com...

If one is willing to give either side a fair hearing ( a couple dozen hours of your time) you will soon see who's using your faith against you.

Stellar

Ok, rather than start a fight, I will just point out that people can independently produce their own color images, as all of the data is in the public domain.

[edit on 9-4-2006 by Ectoterrestrial]