posted on Apr, 10 2006 @ 06:30 PM
Ok, here's the idea:
On this thread, argue seriously for 9/11 theories that you don't actually believe!
For example, if you think the WTC was demolished, argue that it fell naturally. If you think it fell naturally, argue that it was demolished. I
want this thread to focus on WTC issues -- if you want to experiment with other aspects of 9/11, I would absolutely love more threads to further
expand upon this idea.
The idea is that we'll be forced to see things from a different point of view, and thus come to understand each other's arguments more
clearly.
But remember, you have to argue seriously here. No sarcasm, or submitting to the other side of the debate on this thread (since hardly
anyone actually drastically changes their opinions on these issues).
[edit on 10-4-2006 by bsbray11]