It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by psteel
look up the German VT-1 [twin 105mm guns] and VT-2 [twin 120mm guns] designs from the late 1970s. Back then the extra gun doubled the cost of the tank, which is why it was not selected....that and the asymmetrical recoil forces stressed the frame too much.
Originally posted by kinglizard
It would be useful if you had 2 targets at the exact same range spaced to match the spacing of the 2 tank barrels. Not very likely.
If there were two turrets so you could aim and fire on different targets then suddenly you would need to make the tank twice as large as you would need two loaders, two ammo storage cabinets, two commanders and two guys to aim and fire the guns....no I don't think it would work that well.
Originally posted by justin_barton3
It hasnt been possible but with the advances in computer technology would it be possible?
Would any of the above be possible with todays technology and if not how long before it will be possible?
Justin
[edit on 9-4-2006 by justin_barton3]
Originally posted by justin_barton3
....
lonestar - thats a cool looking tank although i was thinking something with a turret.
Oh well it was a cool idea i thought. shame its incredibly inpracticle
justin
Originally posted by jazz_psyker
Now that might be hard to lift for a gunner, so thats why a machine would put it in place. I don't get why tanks use a hand loading system, its philistinic. It takes extra man power, and its slower.