It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Mind you after that day they never broke the convention so technically it isnt against the NPT.
Shots said.
This took place before the NPT was drafted and opened for signatures in 1968.
Therefore it would not apply. Then we have the fact that Isreal never signed the NPT but that is neither here nor there since Britain and the US did.
This is really a none Issue anyhow the OP is just trying to stir up @#$# about Britain where there is none
Originally posted by shots
You seem to think I am taking the opposition side, which I am not. I am with you when it comes to the NPT and totally agree it has nothing to do with the issue when it comes to giving them the material.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Of course history is "old news" and controversy from history will bring "old skeletons out of the closet." Do you think it is pointless to study history? Do you think the world just suddenly arose the day that you all were born?
Look at the date of the article, March 9, 2006.
The present is just an amalgamation of history, it sprang forth from "old news" like it or not. Not only that, but history has repeatedly shown us that it repeats itself. And how many decrying this "old news" go around to all the other threads denouncing events that happened so long ago? Oh, ancient civilizations, look, that's REALLY OLD NEWS. Give me a break. People just get too panicky when the word Israel or Jew is mentioned. All that matters is truth.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Its from 30 years ago, the information no matter when it is publish is still from 30 years ago because THATS WHEN IT HAPPENED....
The truth? The press wouldnt know the truth if it came up and bit them in the ass.
whats the point in conveying an opinion that "they are the cause of the world and they are bad"
if we are going to do that when do we stop ?
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Yea, and the US Civil War happened over a 100 years ago, do you think that is pointless as well?
So, you are disputing the validity of this article then?
Who are you quoting? I didn't see anyone write that. Honestly, I do not think Israel is the cause of the world, that would be like equating them to God and being in existance before the rise of man. You seem to be afraid that people will see Israel negatively and that was exactly my point previously. This is something personal about Israel and the Jews it seems. Do you want to say whatever you can to prevent them from being cast in a negative light? Would you rather cover the truth?
The relevance of history never ends, we ARE the past.
Originally posted by devilwaspIts pointless to drag it out , parade it all the while blaming the said parties in it.
The relevance of history never ends, we ARE the past.
No we are the PRESENT, PAST AND FUTURE.
Are we really going to get into temporal stuff right now?
Originally posted by Jamuhn
There is no dragging out, it's exposing the truth for what it is. Do you think everyone knew about this information before Soljah posted it?
Originally posted by Souljah
The Deals that happen behind Closed Doors, ey?
Ofcourse, we also remember Last Years report, how UK also sent Isreal 20 tonnes of heavy water.
Mister Robert McNamara, President John F Kennedy's defence secretary, has told Newsnight he is "astonished" at the revelation that Britain kept this secret from America and from the World.
So - not only Heavy Water, but also Plutionium.
You can be sure that people will be blamed for their actions, if they didn't I fear what the world would be like today. This thread gives people on ATS a chance to discuss the actions of Britain and Israel and the effects on this today.
All you did was add AND FUTURE onto what I already said lol.
Thank you, you prove my point even further. If this thread doesn't interest you, you have the freedom to leave and let those who don't know about this information or who have an interest to discuss it to do so at their leisure.
This is getting pointless lol....Hopefully I didn't kill the thread.
[edit on 15-3-2006 by Jamuhn]
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Europe is responsible for a number of nations, some of them rogue nations, by the irresponsibleness with nuclear technology, the french being the absolute worse.......geee thanks europe
Originally posted by Nygdan
If it is, Britain has to be punished, clearly.
Originally posted by infinite
But the Soviets have given Nuclear technology away, North Korea is believed to be given the technology and supporting Iran. Shall we punish them too?
SAS trained Al Qaeda members during the Afghan-Soviet war (which we shouldnt').
America sponsered terrorism, especially the IRA (which they shouldn't)
Originally posted by Nygdan
When did the US support the IRA??