It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
RALEIGH, N.C. - The Marine Corps plans to send the troubled Osprey aircraft into combat zones within a year and is activating a squadron of the tilt-rotor planes this week.
Obviously, due to operational concerns we don't want to tell exactly when they will deploy," said spokesman Master Sgt. Phil Mehringer at Marine Corps Air Station New River, where the squadron will be based. "But it's certainly going to happen in the near future. Definitely, within a year."
The Osprey, which takes off and lands like a helicopter and flies like an airplane, had a troubled start.
Four Marines died in a 2000 crash in North Carolina that was caused by a ruptured titanium hydraulic line. Nineteen others were killed in a crash that year in Arizona that investigators blamed on pilot error.
The Pentagon approved full production of the Osprey in a $19 billion program last year, and the Marines have been showing them off. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld flew aboard one last week.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Think its a good idea to send them into combat? None of them have crashed recently. Need more tests?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
So you'd rather have them keep flying the CH-53, which barely stays in the air, or the Chinooks which are so slow and vulnerable it's not even funny?
Originally posted by orca71
Since when does the CH-53 "barely" stay in the air? Chinooks are slow, but the V-22 is only faster at cruise. Additionally, the V-22 has crappy load carrying charactersistics and because of its little over-loaded tilting rotors has to flown with extreme caution when landing, taking off, and transitioning to cruise. Its a stupid design. A real waste of wonderful engines.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by orca71
Since when does the CH-53 "barely" stay in the air? Chinooks are slow, but the V-22 is only faster at cruise. Additionally, the V-22 has crappy load carrying charactersistics and because of its little over-loaded tilting rotors has to flown with extreme caution when landing, taking off, and transitioning to cruise. Its a stupid design. A real waste of wonderful engines.
Yeah, you're right. The CH-53 flight to maintenance ratio is GREAT. I mean having to do 44 man hours of maintenance for every flight hour is a great ratio. We used to have them out here, and they were ALWAYS down for maintenance.
Originally posted by Murcielago
I'm not sure of the maintenence ratio on the V-22...But I'm sure is a lot better then the Chinook.
Also...the bad crash that killed the 19 people inside it...was pilot error, its decend rate is 800 fpm (feet per minute), and he went 1000 fpm...So you cant really blame that on a bad aircraft. As for the most recent crash in Dec. 2000, a hydrualic line burst, which has been redesigned.
I like the Osprey because it can do a lot more then the Chinooks, like fly at 25,000 ft, or go 400+ mph.
Oh...and while on the topic, The V-44 (which is currently a concept) should not even be though about being made until at least a few years of the Osprey being operational.(I like its concept though)