It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

That glowing/firy alien picture?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 24 2006 @ 11:46 AM
link   
I have been searching tha pages for a while now can anyone help me? I am looking for that picture of a so called alien that was glowing and took a more human like body.

Thanks for any help.




posted on Feb, 24 2006 @ 12:00 PM
link   
this?




-DT



posted on Feb, 24 2006 @ 12:07 PM
link   
That looks like it, was there a larger pic of that?

I kept thinking the one I saw had more form in the face butits been so many threads ago I could be wrong. Any info on that pic or others like it?



posted on Feb, 24 2006 @ 12:09 PM
link   
Yep, there are a couple over at ufocasebook.com.

These two as well :




and



Hope that helps.

-DT

(edit to fix link)

[edit on 24-2-2006 by Derek Trance]



posted on Feb, 25 2006 @ 06:14 PM
link   
Could it be an infrared photograph of a human?



posted on Feb, 26 2006 @ 03:36 PM
link   
If it was infrared the you wouldn't see the grass as green.
This is a cat in IR. Notice the different colours on different body parts.



It looks to me like one of those random plasma photos that has formed a humanoid shape.



posted on Feb, 26 2006 @ 11:22 PM
link   
There's a considerable amout of post-processing evident here.

For starters, there are huge areas of pixels with the precise RGB value of 22-22-22. That doesn't happen in nature, and indicates digital image processing if not outright cut-n-paste. I've raised the 22-valued pixels -- and just those -- to 200 so you can see what I mean:



Ok, so maybe the 22-22-22 areas were just below the threshold exposure and subsequent processing brought the base exposure for the image up to the 22 mark? Nope, because there are still quite a few pixels with values below that:



Then there's the dark ring arount the "alien"; it's an indication of cut-n-past, also:



Actually, I think the original image is of a very terrestrial young lady.





EDIT: Added explaination of 200-value pixels.
AND: As I was reviewing the post, my 16 year old daughter came by and gasped "DADdy! You're looking at porn!"
"It's an alien, Sweetheart."
"No it's not, it a naked lady!"
She has the discerning eye of a true sceptic; I'm so proud of her.

[edit on 26-2-2006 by rand]







 
0

log in

join