posted on Feb, 12 2006 @ 10:34 AM
For many years we the people have witnessed the pronunciations from our 'Leaders' regarding the possibility of a Terrorist Act against the United
States or the U.K. or other countries utilising nuclear weapons. The rumblings in the press about such items as "missing Russian nuclear suitcase
bombs" have been well placed at the proper time in order for the Governments to appear reactionary, yet with such timing that the people are
frightened enough not to question the legislation these Governments place into Law, or the actions taken by those Governments.
Is it possible that these 'suitcase bombs' never existed?
That their invention was well placed as a tool to use in the eventuality they wanted a "substantial" threat against other Governments?
Is it possible that the power enclaves in the U.S.A., U.K., Russia, and other countries decided that the continued threats of terrorist attacks with
ever greater weapons of mass destruction were required in order to keep their respective populations under control through the politics of fear?
If these weapons do exist - - why have they not been used by the Chechen Separitists, who would have had first and direct contact with the devices
when the USSR dissolved?
Why does Dubya now speak about a 9/11 repeat in Los Angeles instead of mentioning the 'suitcase' bombs?
Note: The U.S. Bank Tower
in Los Angeles is built to California Earthquake standards, the
result of an aircraft striking the building would result in the deaths of those on the plane, possibly a few on the ground, and a couple of hundred
(at most) in the building itself. The structure is far superior to the WTC towers and any terrorist doing the research would find that the U.S. Bank
Tower makes a very poor target.