Originally posted by Browno
The SLR was a direct licenced copy of the Belgian FN FAL rifle but only capable of semi auto fire, Was a sucessful weapon, accurate and hard hitting
towards the enemy but it was also very bulky and clumbersome, especially to those crammed in small spaces. Officers used Sterling 9MM SMGs instead of
the bulky SLRs until about 1990

Yes, I can confirm the SLR was a good weapon. I still couldn't hit a barn door though lol
According to the Rockapes who tried to teach me to shoot, the SLR was able to be converted to fully automatic - I wasn't sure how, although I was
told, but it was some time ago (almost 15 years ago now).
During the Falklands War, many soldiers reequipped themselves with captured Argentinian FN-FAL - the same rifle (as Browno said), but with fully
automatic.
Originally posted by Browno
The 7.62 Bren Gun, Sucessful weapon but only used 30 round magazines, Same like the AK47 rifle so what was the point of the Bren?
Does not sound like a true machine gun.

It wasn't a true machine gun, in the same sense that the GPMG is. It was a section support weapon, I think each section had one (may have been per
platoon, maybe someone else knows?). Introduced in the 30s, it was an awesome weapon, as most infantry still carried bolt action rifles. But I have
been told it was solid, and reliable, and accurate. A friend of mines dad carried one during the Malay Emergency in the 50s, and was quite effective.
My grandad, who served in both the Suez campaign (chasing Egyptians down the canal as they threw away all their US equipment as they ran!), and in the
Mao-Mao uprising in Kenya, says it was a great weapon, as long as the guy operating it was built like a brick s**thouse!
[edit on 11-2-2006 by tek_604]