It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


please explain more to me

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 24 2005 @ 04:35 PM

Originally posted by sturod84
that leaves means for military security advance? why not shut down the miliatary? costs arent that advanced when there is investment in non-military maintanence. consolodation.

no military, right?

what makes you think any "resistance movement" cannot win?
This still doesn't negate any illegal treaty with the "baddies",
and that's what the "eyes only" (aka TV series "Dark Angel" public release) is for..

posted on Dec, 24 2005 @ 04:56 PM
military advance doesn't need "illegal treaties" to advance..

What's wrong with no military?

Do you feel "safer" with the military/security government?
in that case, the population would welcome a police state, martial law,
lotz government regulation and laws.

Does the military run congress or vice versa?
Let's say the people forbid certain military strategies/tactics..

posted on Dec, 24 2005 @ 05:25 PM
should've made a treaty with "Saddam Hussein" and "Osama" ..

more security and happier population..

new topics
<< 1   >>

log in