Credit card debt a fraud?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 19-12-2005 @ 03:25 AM by Relentless
Actually, you should be careful with the nonprofit credit consolidator too. I looked into this for a friend, who desperately needed it, but there were some complications involved.

The contract involved turning over all your debt to them, and letting them manage the payments. You needed to send them the monthly payment and you better not blow that one. Problem is one of the things they required was that you dealt with everything in cash while you're debt is being paid down, you were not permitted to have a checking account. Though this may be a good way of containing your spending, it makes life very complicated, and some people who have trouble managing their finances can really blow it with their cash.

You would need to pay all your utilities and them with money orders. That can be a real hassle. Forget the extra fees to get the money orders, think about having to get to the bank to cash your pay, and not being able to get to the post office or something to get the money orders, or having to run all over town to make utility payments at places that accept them. Not an easy task for (in this case) a single working mom. How many personal errands can you run on company time? If you have obligations like having to pick your child up from child care after work, how could you possibly fit this into your schedule?

Plus, another thing I didn't realize (till an employee that worked off site and was having his paychecks mailed, and sometimes the mail just took too long, so I kept getting in his face about direct deposit so he wouldn't have to bother accounting every day about where his check was) was that banks now actually refuse some people to open a checking account. I got the impression that this mostly occurs when you have a history of bounced checks or overwithdrawals at the ATM, but once you don't have one, apparently your credit report is checked to see if you are even worthy of having opening one. Ask a lot of questions before signing a contract and be sure you can meet their demands once you are in contract with them. If they won't permit a checking account, see if they will permit a prepaid spending card for payments to them and your utilities (most of which accept payment via debit card I believe).

Most of all, if you do one of these services the one thing you better be sure of is that you never miss or make late a payment to them. Otherwise it gets real ugly.

Ask a lot of questions before signing.

As for these places that say they can wipe out your debt, the ususal scam is that they challenge everything on your credit report. This way, it cannot appear on your report while the charges are being disputed. During this time you have a clear credit report, but guess what, it's not gone, they can just show you a clean credit report during the challenge period. A few months later, it's all back on there.



reply posted on 19-12-2005 @ 11:17 AM by FatherLukeDuke
Originally posted by dollmonster
Attero Auctorita, I never claimed to advocate not paying back money I willingly spent. If so wouldn't I choose to file bankruptcy?

You would still have to pay back as much of your debt as you could even if you declared bankruptcy. They would take away all your possesions that were not considered "essential", and a record of it would stay with you for life. Bankruptcy is not a "walk away free" card, other wise people would do it every 5 minutes.


Knowing what I know about the income tax conspiracy, it wouldn't surprise me if the law was twisted again in the name of corporate profit!

The so called income tax conspiricy is bunk. What do you mean by "twisted" law anyway? It is a contract, pure and simple - they have been around for thousands of years and are backed by well established national law. You have signed a bit of paper saying that you would like to borrrow some money from the lender (the credit card company) at a certain price (the interest) within certain terms for repayment and what will happen in the case of non-payment. The terms of the contract cannot break any existing laws (such as the right of lender to hack off your arms with a rusty saw in the event of non-payment). Other than that you had complete free will in choosing whether or not you wanted sign that contract and take the money (which you obviously did).


Surely it would be the same scenario for credit card debt if it turns out banks too are bending the law. Raising interest rates at their discretion is a prime example of this I would wager.

Why do you think that the ability of a government to raise income tax and the laws relating to contracts and personal debts should be related? I suppose if you started off with the general view that "it's all a big conspiricy" then you might take this stance. However it would be very irrational. The ability of the credit card company to change interest rates will also be governed by the contract (which will have to make sure it meets pre-existing laws as well). Why don't you pull the contract out and have a read of it?


Any way, if these are real lawyers exposing this so called fraud, how can I prove or disprove their claims?

Well as they have disappeared into the ether it will be pretty hard to test their claims. You might as well ask about how you would prove or disprove the claims of the guys promising to give you a 12 inch penis for $25.


Surely if this is another conspiracy, someone from ATS must have at least heard rumors by now.

The only conspiricy is by hucksters sending spam emails that attempt to convince the credulous and naive that they can get away with not paying debts or income tax by simply sending them a small fee. Don't fall for the conspiricy.


reply posted on 19-12-2005 @ 01:55 PM by ufia
I'm not here to prove or disprove any claims, heck, I'm not even a lawyer.

But I just wanted to point you to this website
www.etext.org... about the author of IRS conspiracy.

While googling I also found those laws from the Internal Revenue Code.
www4.law.cornell.edu... 07803----000-.html

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 80 > Subchapter A > § 7803

§ 7803. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; other officials

(a) Commissioner of Internal Revenue

(1) Appointment

(A) In general

There shall be in the Department of the Treasury a Commissioner of Internal Revenue who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to a 5-year term. Such appointment shall be made from individuals who, among other qualifications, have a demonstrated ability in management.


TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 80 > Subchapter A > § 7804

§ 7804. Other personnel

(a) Appointment and supervision

Unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is authorized to employ such number of persons as the Commissioner deems proper for the administration and enforcement of the internal revenue laws, and the Commissioner shall issue all necessary directions, instructions, orders, and rules applicable to such persons. (b) Posts of duty of employees in field service or traveling Unless otherwise prescribed by the Secretary




reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 09:47 AM by paranoia
I would give Mary Croft's ebook a read. It contains lots of very interesting information regarding tax, credit cards, law, and debt. It's also more than just "theories".. actual processes the woman in question has gone through and suceeded in. Here is a small quote from the opening paragraph of the book:


“You know there is no law compelling you to pay tax on your income.”... She then produced a series of letters, the drift of which was to request the bank to provide me with three things:

1. validation of the debt (the actual accounting);
2. verification of their claim against me (a sworn affidavit or even just a signed invoice); and,
3. a copy of the contract binding both parties.

I was to write that, as soon as I received these three documents, I would be happy to pay any financial obligation I might lawfully owe. The banks can’t validate the debt because they never sustained a loss; they can’t verify any claim against me because I am not the NAME they are billing - more on this later. They can’t produce a copy of the contract because one doesn’t exist. What exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract. What the banks refer to as ‘your contract with us’ is not a valid bilateral agreement since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the credit card ‘application’, namely:

1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are creating the credit with our signature);
2. Equal Consideration (they bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose);
3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based upon fraud); and
4. Signatures of the Parties (corporations can’t sign because they can’t contract - they are legal fictions).


www.wealth4freedom.com...


reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 07:36 PM by cybertroy
I think credit card companies can be pretty unethical in their practices. I think some of them abuse the agreement you have with them. I'll give you my personal example.

I have one Chase credit card, that is abusing me terribly. I use their name because I'm sick of it. Firstly, yes, it was me who got behind for a time, and started the "overdraft snowball." My fault. But I did start making larger payments over the past year, $50 a month. But this was not a minimum payment, so again the $30 - $35 overdraft fee applies. And to add to this, a $30 - $35 late fee is being tacked onto this bill, every month, despite me paying on or before the due date. I've been paying $50 a month for near a year.

My minimum payment is now $1200+ just to get to the point where I will be down below my credit limit and stop the overdrafts.

You may ask what my credit limit is? Well, it's $1000. That's right, my minimum payment exceeds the credit limit! I haven't bought a thing with the card in over a year. I'm guessing I've only really charged around $1300 total to the card. And I'm guessing I paid them roughly $1000 in the years I have owned the card. I got the card around the beginning of 2003. Chase allmost allways got a payment every month, I was paying the minimums and being on time most of the time, untill a little over a year ago.

At what point do some of these credit card companies stop punishing their customers for something that happened months ago? Isn't there some kind of moral judgement that should be made by the credit card sompany when they see that thier customer is making a good effort to pay down the bill? Yeah, I messed up for a short period, but holy cow, how many thousands of dollars are they going to inflate the bill to?

$50 is a generous payment in my eyes, especially when I was only paying $19 before the credit got messed up. If Chase makes a little money off of me, fine, but this is abusive. I don't have $1200 laying around, even if I did, do I really "owe" them this money? $1200 could be much better spent, and not given to "theives."

Troy


reply posted on 23-12-2005 @ 11:52 PM by Seekerof
Originally posted by Attero Auctorita
Anyway, there is a Marxist point of view.

Understood, but allow me to give a capitalism point of view.



They are the perfect instrument to keep the proletariat (i.e. working class masses) subdued and in chains.

Attero, those who "keep" themselves "subdued and in chains" are those who lack financial discipline and put themselves in debt by using those credit cards. You nor anyone else that have incurred large amounts of credit card debt have no business blaming capitalism, credit card companies, and/or any of the financial institutions for your indebtness, no one but yourselves.



The working class is barely paid enough money to do anything but exist, sometimes they don't have enough money due to an accident/problem (required medical work/car dies, whatever).

Regardless if half of what you say is accurate, your making excuses, nothing more, nothing less.




They rely on credit cards which the credit card companies always may sure you have tons of offers for.

If they rely on those credit cards to pay bills, then they lack financial discipline and had no business willingly accepting those credit cards in the first place. Last time I checked, credit cards are not forced upon anyone to accept, and when accepted, a contract of sorts is signed between the one doing the accepting and the one doing the lending.




You use a credit card to get out of a hard situation where you have no money, then unforseeable another accident/problem occurs and you use the credit card again, and keep digging a hole for yourself.

Pretty much. Adds more merit to the mention of lack of financial discipline. You spend, and likewise try to save, within your means, as if you did NOT have those credit cards.




Debt is just another way to keep the class distinctions seperate, and keeping the capitalists on top of the food chains. They own the companies who exploit the laborer, and they own the companies that the laborer owes debt to.

And again, those "proletariat" can thwart those dern capitalists by simply saying 'no' when one receives those credit card company credit card offerings, huh?







seekerof

[edit on 24-12-2005 by Seekerof]


reply posted on 24-12-2005 @ 02:00 AM by Attero Auctorita
Originally posted by Seekerof
Attero, those who "keep" themselves "subdued and in chains" are those who lack financial discipline and put themselves in debt by using those credit cards. You nor anyone else that have incurred large amounts of credit card debt have no business blaming capitalism, credit card companies, and/or any of the financial institutions for your indebtness, no one but yourselves.

That is indeed true. But due to low wages paid to the proletariat, they see their only refuge as being that of the credit card.


Regardless if half of what you say is accurate, your making excuses, nothing more, nothing less.

Yeah, one thing i've noticed about capitalists these days is that they do not like excuses. There is not excuse for anything. No reason for anything. The proletariat who runs into financial trouble has to either starve to death via poverty or incur debt.



If they rely on those credit cards to pay bills, then they lack financial discipline and had no business willingly accepting those credit cards in the first place. Last time I checked, credit cards are not forced upon anyone to accept, and when accepted, a contract of sorts is signed between the one doing the accepting and the one doing the lending.

Agreed. I made a point to show in my original post that by using credit cards one signs a legally binding contract which notifies them of their terms of service.

Anyway, i'm speaking as somebody who has no debt, and who has just finished a class in Marxism at KU. I don't necessarily agree with this view point, I just thought I might voice the potential views of the poor working masses, as I see them.

- Attero
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies