It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
You should read his entire report, as it shows Saddam did, indeed, make connections in his search for yellowcake.
Link please!
Then explain why Saddam would look elsewhere for what he already had at home, and why he would want yellowcake when Iraq had no way to enrich it?
"Though most reporters continue to insist that Iraq had abandoned its nuclear weapons program after the first Gulf War, chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer told Congress earlier this year that the Iraqi scientists were "preserving and expanding [their] knowledge to design and develop nuclear weapons."
Originally posted by zappafan1
You can't strictly use dictionary definitions when speaking of tyrants and dictators.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
You really are not that bright are you.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
'Saddam never abandoned intentions' is not the same as 'WMD were found'.
The Iraqi STATE was not in possession of any WMD.
The Dulfer report did draw the conclusion that no WMD were found.
Originally posted by zappafan1
You did not address my post directly. But I will yours:
"...... fiscal imbalance caused by US defense (there's an S in defense)spending"
REPLY: There is no fiscal imbalance in America related to defense spending.
Originally posted by zappafan1
• Found: 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
• Found: 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons
• Found: Roadside bombs loaded with sarin gas
• Found: 1,000 radioactive materials--ideal for radioactive dirty bombs
• Found: 17 chemical warheads--some containing cyclosarin, a nerve agent five times more powerful than sarin
And you were saying..........?
A good read, for those with an open mind, is entitled "Disinformation."
Originally posted by zappafan1
PLEASE provide a link for your claims.
This is not in the dulfer report other than the single Sarin shell, and the non-weapons grade radioactive material under UN seal.
You have been duped by a propagandist if you believe this.
If these things existed please explain why they are not in the Dulfer Final Report?"
The "link" is there, but, no, I'm not going to buy the book for you..... which contains more information than you want to read or hear.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
Let's assume for a moment Bush decided not to invade Iraq and that Iraq subsequently provided radioactive or chemical material to Al Qaeida who in turn used them against Europe or the US.
How silly.
Didn't you read the Dulfer report?
What would you think of GB as a leader if he decided NOT to invade Iraq and the US was subsequently attacked by terrorists using radiological/chemical weapons obtained from Iraq?
Originally posted by zappafan1
"No, there isn't. There is no s in defence." Or do you mean "da fence."
REPLY:What dictionary are you looking at?
"There is also no z in organise, there is a u in colour, and gaol is spelt with a g."
REPLY: Again, you must be using a British dictionary. There are three dictionaries in my spellchecker; none show my spellings to be incorrect.
"gaul" is spelled "goal." Isn't it? A "u" in color....?
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
Just reported on Fox News that Saddam Hussein moved Chemical weapons to Syria 6 months before the war. I tried to find the story on the web site but was unable. I guess this takes the wind outta the dems sails since there clearly was a danger.
Originally posted by Majic
I guess that's why he went out of his way to comply with UNSCOM.