Regardless as to whether you think a Boeing hit the Pentagon or not, if you think the Pentagon hit was an inside job, logic would dictate that there
would have to be a motive for the elements in the US government to go through all the trouble and risk to want to attack it's own defense
headquarters.
There are
plenty of motives I can see as to why the government perps would want to
hit the Pentagon on 9/11, but
one motive stands out more than the
rest in my opinion.
Now it's a dead giveaway that the Pentagon was hit on purpose from the "lucky" spot it was hit:
"
Luck -- if it can be called that -- had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757
at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been
renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant
to bolster it against
attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the
explosion's reach." - USA Today (1/01/02)
"...the plane struck the building
almost in the middle of
the space where the renovation had been completed. Personnel had not completely reoccupied this area of the building.
"This contributed to the relatively low number of casualties," Schwartz said. "
The number could have been far greater had the plane struck
another portion of the building not affected by the renovation." - Fort Meade/Army
But besides being hit in such a "lucky spot," this is the real reason why I think the Pentagon was hit where it was hit. It first starts with what
Secretary of Defense Donald "and the missile to damage this building"
Rumsfeld conveniently announced the day before the attacks that was sure to get buried amongst all the choas that was about to happen:
"
On Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the
Pentagon bureaucracy," he said.
Rumsfeld promised change but the next day – Sept. 11-- the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to
have been forgotten.
Just last week President Bush announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than $48 billion in new defense spending."
More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of
what it spends.
"
According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in
transactions," Rumsfeld admitted." -CBS (01/29/02)
Now guess what was located in the renovated section that was hit:
So how convenient that the attacks came near the end of the fiscal year and that important budget information that may have shown a paper trail to
some of that "lost"
$2.3 trillion just got incinerated in the explosion from whatever hit there.
Now along with the paper trial that just got incinerated, check out what also was incinerated in that section:
Now that's motive for elements in our government to attack the Pentagon if I ever saw one!
Oh, and who at the Pentagon was in charge of all the Pentagon's money? That's right,
PNAC member Dov Zakheim, contributing author of the PNAC's "we need another
Pearl Harbor" manifesto:
"Dov S. Zakheim was sworn in as
the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief
Financial Officer for the Department of Defense on May 4, 2001. Dr. Zakheim has previously served in a number of key positions in government and
private business. Most recently,
he was corporate vice president of System Planning Corp., a technology, research and analysis firm based in
Arlington, Va. He also served as chief executive officer of SPC International Corp., a subsidiary specializing in political, military and economic
consulting. During the 2000 presidential campaign, he served as a senior foreign policy advisor to then-Governor Bush.
Dr. Zakheim has been an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University....
Dr. Zakheim has written, lectured and provided media commentary on national defense and foreign policy issues domestically and internationally. He is
the author of "Flight of the Lavi: Inside a U.S.-Israeli Crisis"" - DoD
"To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new
technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.
Moreover,
the Pentagon, constrained by limited budgets and pressing current missions, has seen funding for experimentation and transformation
crowded out in recent years. Spending on military research and development has been reduced dramatically over the past decade.
Further,
the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing
event –
like a new Pearl Harbor.
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Dov Zakheim
System Planning Corporation" - "Rebuilding America's Defenses" - PNAC [Pages 50-51] (Sept. 2000)
and what does Zakheim's former company make?
Also reported and rumored about Zakheim:
"He is an ordained Orthodox Jewish rabbi...as well as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations." -
Wikipedia
"Zakheim, who is a dual Israeli/American citizen and a Shul Rabbi..." -
judicial-inc
See more on the Pentagon crash
here.
[edit on 17-11-2005 by Killtown]
[edit on 17-11-2005 by Killtown]
