Is this why the Pentagon was hit where it was hit?

Regardless as to whether you think a Boeing hit the Pentagon or not, if you think the Pentagon hit was an inside job, logic would dictate that there would have to be a motive for the elements in the US government to go through all the trouble and risk to want to attack it's own defense headquarters.

There are plenty of motives I can see as to why the government perps would want to hit the Pentagon on 9/11, but one motive stands out more than the rest in my opinion.

Now it's a dead giveaway that the Pentagon was hit on purpose from the "lucky" spot it was hit:

"Luck -- if it can be called that -- had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach." - USA Today (1/01/02)

"...the plane struck the building almost in the middle of the space where the renovation had been completed. Personnel had not completely reoccupied this area of the building.
"This contributed to the relatively low number of casualties," Schwartz said. "The number could have been far greater had the plane struck another portion of the building not affected by the renovation." - Fort Meade/Army

But besides being hit in such a "lucky spot," this is the real reason why I think the Pentagon was hit where it was hit. It first starts with what Secretary of Defense Donald "and the missile to damage this building" Rumsfeld conveniently announced the day before the attacks that was sure to get buried amongst all the choas that was about to happen:

"On Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy," he said.
Rumsfeld promised change but the next day – Sept. 11-- the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to have been forgotten.
Just last week President Bush announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than $48 billion in new defense spending."
More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends.
"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted." -CBS (01/29/02)

Now guess what was located in the renovated section that was hit:

"The impact area included both the Navy operations center and the office complex of the National Guard and Army Reserve. It was also the end of the fiscal yearimportant budget information was in the damaged area." -Arlington County After-Action Report

So how convenient that the attacks came near the end of the fiscal year and that important budget information that may have shown a paper trail to some of that "lost" $2.3 trillion just got incinerated in the explosion from whatever hit there.

Now along with the paper trial that just got incinerated, check out what also was incinerated in that section:

"Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck." - South Coast Today/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (12/20/01)

Now that's motive for elements in our government to attack the Pentagon if I ever saw one!


Oh, and who at the Pentagon was in charge of all the Pentagon's money? That's right, PNAC member Dov Zakheim, contributing author of the PNAC's "we need another Pearl Harbor" manifesto:

"Dov S. Zakheim was sworn in as the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Defense on May 4, 2001. Dr. Zakheim has previously served in a number of key positions in government and private business. Most recently, he was corporate vice president of System Planning Corp., a technology, research and analysis firm based in Arlington, Va. He also served as chief executive officer of SPC International Corp., a subsidiary specializing in political, military and economic consulting. During the 2000 presidential campaign, he served as a senior foreign policy advisor to then-Governor Bush.
Dr. Zakheim has been an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University....
Dr. Zakheim has written, lectured and provided media commentary on national defense and foreign policy issues domestically and internationally. He is the author of "Flight of the Lavi: Inside a U.S.-Israeli Crisis"" - DoD

"To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.
Moreover, the Pentagon, constrained by limited budgets and pressing current missions, has seen funding for experimentation and transformation crowded out in recent years. Spending on military research and development has been reduced dramatically over the past decade.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Dov Zakheim
System Planning Corporation" - "Rebuilding America's Defenses" - PNAC [Pages 50-51] (Sept. 2000)

and what does Zakheim's former company make?

System Planning Corporation's Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provide remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system.

System Planning Corporation's is proud to offer the Flight Termination System (FTS), a fully redundant turnkey range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles.

Also reported and rumored about Zakheim:

"He is an ordained Orthodox Jewish rabbi...as well as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations." - Wikipedia

"Zakheim, who is a dual Israeli/American citizen and a Shul Rabbi..." - judicial-inc

See more on the Pentagon crash here.

[edit on 17-11-2005 by Killtown]

[edit on 17-11-2005 by Killtown]

Have you seen the aerial pics of the Pentagon? There is ONE side that has a clear approach, without trees, parking structures or any other obstacle, and that happens to be the side they rebuilt first and was hit on 9/11. As far as nose diving into the building, that's a LOT harder to do than people realize. A lot harder than flying a relatively flat trajectory into the side of the building.

If the cruise missle had hit anywhere other than the airplane parts storage room it would not have looked like an airliner hit the Pentagon.