It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Was Carl Sagan correct? are the effects of time dilation near Light Speed that drastic? If so I have to say thats simply amazing that means humans can travel to the far reaches of the universe without any faster then light loopholes and still be alive for the end of the trip.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The real problem is that even though time slows down, your life span is cut to about 1 millisecond and you die about the same time as all your cohorts.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The real problem is that even though time slows down, your life span is cut to about 1 millisecond and you die about the same time as all your cohorts.
Your body is made up of around 100 million million cells. Some of them, including brain cells, are rarely replaced. Others are constantly replaced, as existing cells multiply to make new ones. However, each cell can only multiply a certain number of times before it dies. As more cells are lost or damaged, you start to show signs of ageing. For example, the fewer skin cells you have, the thinner your skin becomes.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
How do you know that? Einstein said that time as measured by clocks slows down, but clocks don't measure time. All clocks have one thing in common--they move! We calibrate them and call it time. If time as measured by clocks slows then all that really happens is that everything that moves slows down. That doesn't mean you live longer.
Originally posted by Esoterica
That's actually exactly what it means. Because time is relative. From the Earth's point of view, 30,000 years have passed and time has slowed down for you. From your point of view, time is normal and time on Earth has just sped up dramatically. Technically, you've only lived another 21 years from your point of view. And from Earth's point of view, it's lived another 30,000 years.
Originally posted by Amuk
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The real problem is that even though time slows down, your life span is cut to about 1 millisecond and you die about the same time as all your cohorts.
Do you have ANYTHING to back this up?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
That statement was made tongue-in-cheek. Still, there is nothing in the theory of relativity that suggests that human travel at or near "c" is possible or that doing so would make one live longer. There's no reason not to suggest that at those speeds a man would have the lifespan of a fruitfly.
Frosty
First, time dilation has never been proven, second, it doesn't exist. In the case of the twins, they will always be relative to each other, so I don't see why the one twin doesn't age as much as the other.
I would really love to hear the chemistry and biology behind this from any believers.
Originally posted by Esoterica
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
That statement was made tongue-in-cheek. Still, there is nothing in the theory of relativity that suggests that human travel at or near "c" is possible or that doing so would make one live longer. There's no reason not to suggest that at those speeds a man would have the lifespan of a fruitfly.
Frosty
First, time dilation has never been proven, second, it doesn't exist. In the case of the twins, they will always be relative to each other, so I don't see why the one twin doesn't age as much as the other.
I would really love to hear the chemistry and biology behind this from any believers.
You two are obviously very ignorant of what you're trying to talk about.
Time Dilation Experiment: Proof of Time dilation
I will say it again Time is relative. This has been theorized and proven. If you two can't comprehend what relativity means, that's not your fault. But apparently neither of you have even tried to understand it.
Originally posted by Frosty
I can walk down and back up the street (and my friend stays at the point of origin), the same amount of time will have elapsed for me as that of my friend who stayed at the point where I started from, right?
[edit on 11-11-2005 by Frosty]