Planet X, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 20-9-2003 @ 02:23 PM by Byrd
Ah yes. Velikovski (the last reference is based on Velikovski).

He's been VERY thoroughly debunked. I was quite surprised to find that a few people out there still believe in him.

Here's an easy test for folks -- find some real evidence that the Earth had a global catastrophe 3600 years ago. To make your research easier, here's what happened (documented, historical evidence with good time correlation... no radiocarbon dating in case you wondered)

...in the years between 2900 BC and 2000 BC:
www.wikipedia.org...

(which would be 3600 years ago with a healthy bracket on either side)

...and between 4000 BC and 3000 BC:
www.wikipedia.org...

...and so forth back to the 10th millennium BC.
www.wikipedia.org...

That time period covers two (and a bit) of these "Catastrophic Encounters With Horrible Planet." Perhaps you can point to the sections in the Earth's history here that indicate Horrible Planet Showing Up And Wiping Things Out? I can't seem to find it.


reply posted on 23-9-2003 @ 09:18 PM by Ark-Angel
quote bryd
Sitchin MISINTERPRETED the Enumma Elish for his own financial gains. It's a hoax/lie so the man could sell books to the gullible.

I disagree

10th planet makes sense, even a Nasa scientist Dr. Harrington was looking for a planet that would solve the problems seen in our own universe. Knocking planets on their side and even taking a Moon and turning it into a planet, we call Pluto.
Remember how the World was FLAT and you would fall off, flatly saying this is untrue is not taking it and mixing it with what our past tells us. Monuments we today can't even begin to build yet are still standing to this day. If we have another planet in our system that has a rough orbit of 3600 years means rough. Perhaps on how it can push and pull on the rest of the planets may make it's orbit wobble, just as our own planet does.
Then if this other planet began life before us why would they let us know about them if we are at a pointe they may have gone thru already with WARS?

To say he is doing this for money is making a statement you have no evidence.
Jim Jones or David Karaseh? knowing what we do about them can say yes it was money and power they were after. Your assuming and we all know what assume means when translated.

Michael

3600 years shows there was no flood, I agress. But I believe their is a problem with the timeline we are using on some of our past history. Sphinx is a prime example with those trying to date it.
I agree that it is much older than what the current thought is, thus the Flood is in of itself farther back then thought, only the past few thousand of years have we put down a record for those in the future to read.

[Edited on 24-9-2003 by Ark-Angel]

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags