posted on Oct, 23 2005 @ 04:28 AM
(Im continuing on in the bigbang part of this topic, with the idea around missing matter, I dont think its really off topic. Considering its the
'creation' of the universe in which we were 'created' and should point to the same God or cosmic evolution.. (teachers use this random evolution
of the universe to account for intelligence, like its some fluke in a chaotic realm.))
Our senses have proven to be frequency detectors. Our eyes sense vibrations or frequencys we call light, our hands feel the vibration of what
appears to be solid matter, and our ears pick up vibrations we call sound. Even our sense of smell picks up frequencys we call smell. There are things
that are out of the range of our frequency detecting "senses." Like a high pitch whistle dogs can hear, or light in a spectrum we cant see...
Heres an idea i read somewhere, and maybe its totally stupid, but i thinks its at least fun to think about>>>
Some waves of matter or wave-particles are not visible to us. Like infrared, x-ray, ultraviolet, and so on. So ultraviolet light waves could
"become" particles anywhere on the wave, or "act" as particles; And form an everyday object like a shoe. And this shoe could be sitting on your
face or in your ear and you would not be able to sense it because its in a spectrum you cannot sense. So the missing matter, or wave-particles,
could just be in wave form in a spectrum that we are not able to perceive through our normal senses, and perhaps even with the various telescopes
pointed into space. Any object or matter made from particle-waves that operate in a spectrum we cant sense could fly right through us and we wouldnt
notice. An entire galaxy where everything is in another spectrum could fly right through our own Milky Way with out anyone noticing.
(Sure white light cant go thru solid objects, but dont we use infrared cameras to "see" heat signatures thru walls? Cant we hear thru walls?
Couldnt another type of frequency travel thru solid objects as well?...)
The anti bigbang list has this sentance in the missing matter point "(I exclude the additional 50%-100% of invisible ordinary matter inferred to
exist by, e.g., MACHO studies.) " I dont know what the MACHO studies are, but maybe its along the same lines of what I said.(?)
I dont know if everything in the universe has been found and labled yet, I doubt it since they are finding new particles all the time. So it
could be a possibility that whole other worlds exist in a 'spectrum' that we simply cannot sense in anyway. This could account for the missing
matter. Or maby the calculations for the amount of matter we are supposed to have only takes into account everything acting as a particle at the same
time? Or maybe the missing particle-waves left our universe? As we may find out gravity particles, or gravitons, leave as well, accounting for
gravity's increadible weakness. The point is that theres too many maybes in physics to really know whats going on, at least for now.