Nope, murder is a personal thing. No reason for you to get involved or any government imposed laws. You think because there is government and laws,
that stops people from getting murdered and/or stops people from murdering? So what exactly is your point then?
No government imposed laws against murder!? And you think that people would just stop murdering? You can't seriously be naive enough to think that
laws against murdering people don't stop them from murdering. If there were no laws against murder, I'm pretty sure I'd be dead. Most likely you
too! If somebody doesn't like your views, *Bam*. Anytime two people get into a fight, one could end up dead, and you don't think there should be
laws against that? Face it: if there were no laws against murder, what incentive would people have for not murdering people? Some pissed off drunk
with a gun could just walk outside and start shoot some guy, and you would be fine with him not being punished? It still happens, occasionally, in a
place with laws, but the people who do the shooting wind up in jail or dead, which is incentive to the other people not to murder. This is
kindergarten level logic here. I shouldn't have to explain it to you.
This is all not true. It is called supply and demand, free trade.
A government needs to be involved for there to really be a working economy. If not, where does one get the resources to build their business? Just
walk out, and...make their own supplies from scratch? I guess they could buy a lawn mower off of somebody then sell it for...oh wait, never-mind. No
. No money either! Well then they could make some bread...oh wait, they would have to buy that somewhere...dang... I guess they could
find someone who knew how to make bread from nothing, and trade them for something else! Then they could harness some electricity, and bake it in an
oven... That is if they don't get beat up for their bread and possessions on the way home, because there would be no laws to protect them. And if
they made it home, they could just hope that nobody has broken into their self-made home, and stolen all of their stuff, because there would be no
laws against stealing.
Also all not true. People DO NOT have to work together to achieve things. They could if they chose to. But IF I chose to work with you, how does
that boil down into a government? Are we the government? Nope. Just 2 people personally working with each other. No third party needs to
interject. Your just a scared little person, huh? TIODS.
Do you really think that the Internet would be here if it weren't for a government? Who would have funded the creator of it? The electricity, the
bills, without a government, there would be almost nothing. How would you pay for the internet? Certainly not money, because money would be
worthless without a government. No monetary system, no real economic system. I guess you could give the internet provider something for your
internet service... But then who's to say he doesn't just keep it and cut off your internet? There would be no laws against such things. Plus,
where would the internet come from? Computers?
Look, we've seen what happens when there's no government control. New Olreans? Looting, killing, stealing, all these things had arisen within days
of that city being destroyed. Why? Because the government had no control and the people knew that they could do what they want. People have ALWAYS
had governments. It's a basic need and an instinct for survival. Look at some of the primitive tribes that still exist today. They always have
some kind of head figure to dictate what they're doing and make sure that people don't just run rampant.
Scared? I think not. Logical? I think so.
And I don't know what TIODS means...