It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[...]
Installing
1. Create your virtual machine in VMware. Set guest OS to FreeBSD or Other, give it as much hard drive space as you can afford.
2. Run VMware with the Darwin 8.01 install ISO. Hit Esc and boot from CD.
3. Let Darwin boot from the CD image. All being well, you should see the VMware drive listed above the command prompt.
26. Type the incredibly long command "cp -RLv CoreGraphics /volumes/"untitled 1"/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Versions/A/" NOTE: As I am unsure of the correct syntax also run "cp -RLv CoreGraphics /volumes/"untitled 1"/System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Versions/A" (no / at the end this time!) just to be safe. [...] This copies the patched CoreGraphics to the relevant location. [...]
27. Type "./ditto -rsrc /volumes/"untitled 1" /" and in theory you're now copying the PearPC stuff onto the VMware Darwin install. This is pretty much it people..! Takes a long while, particularly from the 6GB image [...]
28. Here it goes..! "reboot". With any luck you'll see the lovely sight of OSX x86 booting up. Give it a good few minutes. Damn thing takes its time. DO NOT REBOOT once it gets to the desktop until you have done the next step, else you've just screwed up as it won't reboot.
29. Get into Disk Utility. Again I assume you know how to do this owning a devkit. Select the osxvol (not the PearPC disk) and run RepairPermissions on it. You can now reboot safely.
30. Erm... that's it! Well done assuming you didn't screw everything up. You now have an OSX x86 install ready for future use. Snapshot the virtual machine before you break it and wait for future developments. [...]
The impact of the OSx86 hack on Apple's hardware brand could be severe.
The hack shows that Steve Jobs' company will be turning out machines indistinguishable from any other PC, or "white box," said German hacker Michael "mist" Steil.
"Apple wants to avoid the word getting out that (MacIntels) are just PCs, and that (OSx86) works on PCs," said Steil.
Steil made a name for himself hacking Microsoft's Xbox game console. He has seen the hacked OSx86 running on a PC, and has been watching the conversations at the OSx86 Project website. But he said he is not hacking the operating system himself.
source
The importance of this news is not that everyone will be setting this up on their computers tonight, putting Apple out of business tomorrow. It is the potential over time that has been set up by Apple and Intel already and what it could mean eventually.
The hack shows that Steve Jobs' company will be turning out machines indistinguishable from any other PC, or "white box...."
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The way I see it, Apple has two options:
1) wage an ever escalating war with hackers to keep it at least difficult to maintain a working Mac OS X setup on generic PC hardware
2) go with it, and perhaps someday license OS X to other manufacturers such as Dell as on OS option to compete head on with Windows
I think they'll probably be keeping their options somewhat open for now
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I can't predict the future, but the real news is this:
The hack shows that Steve Jobs' company will be turning out machines indistinguishable from any other PC, or "white box...."
This alone is more important than the hack. I don't think these geeks who are doing this are doing it because it is so practical, but because it shows the world what the world will be like when Apple and Microsoft are running on essentially identical machines.
The hack is not the real story. It's what the hack means.
[edit on 2005/8/12 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by djohnsto77
2) go with it, and perhaps someday license OS X to other manufacturers such as Dell as on OS option to compete head on with Windows
I think they'll probably be keeping their options somewhat open for now
Originally posted by FallenFromTheTree
There's no question that a fully optimized x86 version will be much better than any [k]ed version.