It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intrepid
I don't think I even came close to saying execute theives.
Originally posted by intrepid
I'm not talking about people that take property, I'm talking about monsters that make peoples lives a living hell. Literally. It's a pain that I don't understand, you can't understand, unless you've been through it. If a person experiences this type of invasion and survives, they suffer with it for the rest of their lives.
Originally posted by intrepid
I think our high ideals dwindle compared to the suffering of the victims AND future victims.
Originally posted by intrepid
Am I not making sense? I don't see the probem here.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
It does make sense Intrepid, that's sort of the problem.
It's an admittedly effective solution at punishing offenders.
But it does nothing to stop the problem.
I think we really need to do extensive studies and figure out just what isn't clicking about not molesting kids. It seems simple enough to 90% of people.
I maintain they're just using the same mate selection software as everyone else, but there's something else going on too, maybe something to do with failed societal interactions, failed inter-personal relationships, or an inability to regulate impulses.
Whatever it is, we should find it and figure out some way of treating it.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Like I said, it's not about blaming the victim, it's about trying to make sure there are no more victims. I think the best way to do that is to understand the problem.
Kill one offender, kill a hundred, it doesn't PREVENT more kids from becoming victims.
Oh yes it does.
Although I will say that the situation just described, about an innocent person, should not be neglected. We're inclined, right off the bat, to kill anyone even ACCUSED of such a crime, because you just don't mess with other people's kids in a civilized society. I understand this, and I agree with it. If it was my kid, you know how I'd feel. That doesn't enter into it, because I wouldn't be THINKING, I'd be FEELING.
Justice should insulate itself against emotion to prevent bad judgement.
Anyway, that's not really the issue. We're talking about preventing the crime here. The state of Florida thinks it can prevent crimes by denying sex offenders access to newstand publication and other literature. I think the state of Florida may need a reality check.
As has been mentioned, our imagination is a far more potent aphrodisiac than Maxim magazine. Until they're willing to lobotomize every sex offender, it will be impossible to prevent them from wanting to hurt children. Even castration and chemical neutering don't work!
There's got to be a way, I just don't know what it is.
Originally posted by intrepid
I already told you the solution. Why is it so hard to accept?
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
You haven't answered my question though. How does killing one sex offender stop another from hurting kids? It doesn't, it can't.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Sex offender 'A' touches a kid. We kill him. How does that stop sex offender'B'? It doesn't. You have to wait until they're caught, and repeat. Children still get victimized.