Why It Makes “Sense” For the Resistance to Target Innocent Iraqis, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 13-7-2005 @ 12:44 AM by Liberal1984
Background...
A majority Sunnis (an ethnic group of less than 25% of the population) still want Saddam. Everyone else fights us because they want us out their country.
Many hate us not just for invading their country but for the looting that we let take place on our watch (in particular Iraqis national library in which books and scrolls over 2000 years old were burnt). Furthermore many Iraqis suffered under the sanctions and they suffer now because little change has taken place (for them). They blame us for both of these things.
Law and order are ordinary Iraqis biggest concerns. Rape, Kidnap, Extortion are daily threats. Many people hate the fact that our troops are so security concerned that they don’t “seem” to be doing much about it themselves.

The Logic...
The Resistance is deliberately making these problems worse because it wants the installed government out. It knows that if this government becomes popular (or even acceptable) in the eyes of ordinary Iraqis that the chances of this happening are greatly reduced.
According to history the Resistance will win because of this factor. In the 1920's Britain occupied Iraq and installed a government in the early 1930’s (I can’t remember the date but it must be on Google). We also used far more brutal tactics than today in order to curb the Resistance and it all backfired. Despite being there for well over a decade when we finally left there was a political revolution shortly afterwards and this was in spite of all the military equipment we had given the English friendly government. At the end of the day military equipment fights wars; not internal revolution.

No doubt the same will happen again.
The more American and recruited Iraqi forces they can kill the closer the Resistance comes to victory. The worse the living standards of the average Iraqi become the angrier they will be at us (or when we’re gone their government). Even when their bombs kill nothing but ordinary Iraqis we get the blame from the masses, and so the Resistance scores another goal.
Many Iraqis may even hate the Resistance, but they blame us for the Resistance being there in the first place (especially as we haven’t left their country). And if we do go then maybe that’s another objective the Resistance has met. Also there are many Resistances in Iraq so even though they all play the same game the chances are an ordinary Iraqi could find one that seems somewhat close to his own views.

A Matter of Speech?
In Iraq terrorism, is not terrorism but Resistance against an occupying force. Unlike "normal" terrorism this is almost "destined" to make political sense no matter how you view its ethics. Why? Because of the “damned if you do, and damned if you don’t” factor faced by almost every occupying force in human history.
This is why it’s important to use the right words because they have real meaning that should not be overlooked. Yours Alex


reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 02:02 AM by Liberal1984
I do not Support terrorism in any shape or form. My desire of getting through to people would be a lot easier without them. I denounce terrorism for political reasons as much as I do for ethical.
But (and I know most people totally disagree) I support Saddam. Perhaps uniquely i used to hate him too, but you would have had to look through a lot of what i have written to understand why I came full circle, and that might be a violation of human rights. My post entitled "Regarding His Excellency Saddam Hussein and His Open Letters to the American People" explains a lot.
I don't like what the Resistance is doing to Iraq, they are all good people in nature simply because they are making a total sacrifice for what they believe to be a higher cause. But if they win I have no doubt it will be instantly reversed by us so what they are doing is a waste of time and human life. In other parts of the world maybe not, but with Iraq’s oil wealth there is a zero possibility of this not happening.
I hate the Resistances tactics but can't pretend I don't imagine understanding where they are coming. I feel sorry for them, but recognise they are doomed to fail.

If I thought they would win, and prevent a fundamentalist Muslim government from rising, then I might agree with them. But even then I wouldn’t support them, I have a life to lead and know there is far more good I can do in other ways (political and non political). And I will not have blood on my hands, politicians who do have often failed to be the best the leader (Bush, Blair and yes admittedly Saddam).

In a way what you said is a valid assumption so I will not take offence (given all the stuff I have been saying). It’s an even more valid assumption when you view the facts and opinions expressed by myself through the paranoid eyes of the mainstream media!!


reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 10:20 AM by Seekerof
There is NO making "sense" for the targeting/killing of innocents...

Let me make something clear to some of you obviously mis-informed people that have just posted that you condone the attacking/targeting of innocent Iraqis/civilains:
Islam does not condone the use of terrorism, nor the use of suicide bombings/terrorist acts, and nor the targeting nor killing of innocents.
In fact, they are forbidden, no matter if it be infidel, no matter the sect, etc!

Does this compute?!
Do you realize or understand this?
I certainly hope so, cause it is people like some of you that give Islam a bad rap and name.

If you think I am wrong, please say so. I have no problem, whatsoever, in being wrong. I would advize that these be read objectively before you claim such though, k?

Moderator: Is the use of violence against civilians a reaction to the Americans, Yasser?

Al-Sirri: Killing innocent civilians is forbidden. I state that this is forbidden. This is an act that we reject and condemn. Whoever kills innocents commits an act that has nothing to do with Islam. We do not need to attribute everything that happens to Islamists.

London Islamist, Yasser Al-Sirri: If bin Laden is Captured or Killed, it will Change Nothing
TA-ANALYSIS: Terrorism: Islamic Perspective (Part 4 of 4)
Suicide Bombers: Why do they do it, and what does Islam say about their actions?
Islam denounces terrorism
Muslims against Terrorism
Only Love Can Defeat Terrorism
thetruereligion.org..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">Terrorism: Islam - A Religion of Terror ?
Killing in the Name of Islam: Al-Qaeda's Justification for September 11
Islamic Statements Against Terrorism in the Wake of the September 11 Mass Murders
Islam and terrorism
What is the Islamic stance on the London bombings?


If practicing Muslims are targeting and killing other Muslims of the Islamic faith, they are doing nothing but practicing Hirabah and according to Islam, are nothing but Hirabah mufsidoon.

Be assured, a ton more links could have been provided. Simply put, some of you need to seriously do some objective research, period.







seekerof

[edit on 13-7-2005 by Seekerof]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

OMG!!! Is this for real??
  Relationships: 16 hours ago, 79 replies
RONY 2012
  US Political Madness: 9 hours ago, 63 replies
Why do UFO's need lights?
  Aliens and UFOs: 17 hours ago, 49 replies