It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Question about London bombs.

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 09:53 PM
link   
Ive got a question.

How many Bombs, Devices were UNDETONATED?

And since the bombings in London took place, there have been a few ' scares ' and emergency evacuations...

How many and what are the details,

Did anyone notice how certain the media and officials were 7 blasts took place, and the locations of these blasts?

, OK after doing some research,

there were 2 UNEXPLODED Bombs found AFTER the attack in London.
and only yesterday birmingham was evactuated...

This seems odd to me...

During the attack, police and officials declared it was a power outage causing train crashes.
On the hours following the attack, police and officials confirmed 7 explosions took place...
..... why have only 4 explosons now been found to be real?

Could it be the government was EXPECTING 7 explosions?
Being they found 2 undetonated devices, and 'something' that was credible enoug hto cause evactuation...

Could it be that for some reason 3 of the planned 7 didnt detonate..
UK Got overzealous and announced all 7 detonated without confirming the reports?
They then removed 2, and lied about the third in order not to raise suspicion?

Fro a long time after the blasts they confirmed 7 bombs,
But not its only 4....

Soemthing definaetly isnt right.



[edit on 11-7-2005 by GlobalDisorder]



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 10:04 PM
link   
I'm not surprised that the number changed as much as it did. On 9/11 they were certain that up to 20 planes had been hijacked at one point. This was a fact as far as it was reported. Then they said four planes had crashed, etc. With all the confusion I'm not surprised how much things changed later. I never did hear about how many undetonated devices they found, just that there were several controlled explosions.



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 07:47 AM
link   
7 incidents 4 bombs - quite simple really 3 bombs were between stations, each causing passengers to appear at two stations reporting bombs back down the track. Plus the bus bomb = 7.

No unexploded devices reoprted - in fact a 'no' was given to direct question re this



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 07:58 AM
link   
but reports of other explosions going off were made up to an hour after the first bomb, (which now they are saying all the bombs went off within 1 minute) so what were the other explosions that were reported?



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 08:08 AM
link   
Difference seems to be between when it actually exploded and when it was reported to Police as a bomb - at first thought to be a crash, technical issue.

London Transport Incident Log

news.bbc.co.uk...



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 08:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by justyc
but reports of other explosions going off were made up to an hour after the first bomb, (which now they are saying all the bombs went off within 1 minute) so what were the other explosions that were reported?


Only 3 went off within one minute. The bus went off later.



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 08:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by tommyc


Only 3 went off within one minute. The bus went off later.


Exactly 1 hour later - they think the bomber adjusted the timer after plans changed / he was evacuated from the Tube




top topics



 
0

log in

join