It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Sunday he is bracing for even more violence in Iraq and acknowledged that the insurgency "could go on for any number of years."
Defeating the insurgency may take as long as 12 years, he said, with Iraqi security forces, not U.S. and foreign troops, taking the lead and finishing the job.
The assessment comes on the heels of the latest Associated Press-Ipsos poll showing public doubts about the war reaching a high point — with more than half saying that invading Iraq was a mistake.
Before the war, Vice President Dick Cheney predicted that Iraqis freed from
Saddam Hussein's rule would greet American troops as liberators. Rumsfeld said Sunday he gave President Bush a list of about 15 things "that could go terribly, terribly wrong before the war started."
Originally posted by Rasputin13
I don't get it... liberals rip the administration when they're too positive in their outlook, such as Bush saying that the US will accept nothing short of complete victory.
Then the libs rip the Administration when they give a somewhat grim outlook, such as the above mentioned link.
You guys are just so consumed with hatred and distrust of Bush and Co. that you'll rip them for anything. What terrible ideology you subscribe to...
Originally posted by Rasputin13
I don't get it... liberals rip the administration when they're too positive in their outlook, such as Bush saying that the US will accept nothing short of complete victory.
Then the libs rip the Administration when they give a somewhat grim outlook, such as the above mentioned link.
You guys are just so consumed with hatred and distrust of Bush and Co. that you'll rip them for anything. What terrible ideology you subscribe to...
WASHINGTON (AP) - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Sunday it may take as long as 12 years to defeat Iraqi insurgents and that Iraqi security forces, not U.S. and foreign troops, will finish the job.
Rumsfeld, addressing a question about whether U.S. troops levels are adequate to vanquish the increasingly violent resistance, said, "We're not going to win against the insurgency. The Iraqi people are going to win against the insurgency. That insurgency could go on for any number of years. Insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Yeah, I guess this was missed too, huh?
Rumsfeld: Iraqis Must Defeat Insurgency
WASHINGTON (AP) - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Sunday it may take as long as 12 years to defeat Iraqi insurgents and that Iraqi security forces, not U.S. and foreign troops, will finish the job.
Rumsfeld, addressing a question about whether U.S. troops levels are adequate to vanquish the increasingly violent resistance, said, "We're not going to win against the insurgency. The Iraqi people are going to win against the insurgency. That insurgency could go on for any number of years. Insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years.
seekerof
[edit on 26-6-2005 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Seekerof
Yeah, I guess this was missed too, huh?
Rumsfeld: Iraqis Must Defeat Insurgency
WASHINGTON (AP) - Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Sunday it may take as long as 12 years to defeat Iraqi insurgents and that Iraqi security forces, not U.S. and foreign troops, will finish the job.
Rumsfeld, addressing a question about whether U.S. troops levels are adequate to vanquish the increasingly violent resistance, said, "We're not going to win against the insurgency. The Iraqi people are going to win against the insurgency. That insurgency could go on for any number of years. Insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years.
seekerof
[edit on 26-6-2005 by Seekerof]
Rumsfeld: "We're not going to win against the insurgency."
Originally posted by Souljah
Apparently the Insurgency will go on until the Oil Reseves in the Middle East are depleted.
Then it will Dissapear....
Originally posted by RedWhiteandBlood
We went to war because we had to.
Originally posted by RedWhiteandBlood
Where is the money for bullets, food, housing, and medicine that is need for fighting? Outside of the money stolen from the Iraqi treasury, which will run out eventually, where are they going to get it?
Originally posted by RedWhiteandBlood
And no one sells a war. We went to war because we had to. To everyone who says this war wasn't neccessary, imagine what it would be like with Sadaam still in power.
Originally posted by RedWhiteandBlood
Okay you guys are insane. This war isn't even close. We took over a country and held it for two years with less than 2,000 dead. Terrorist attacks do nothing and are a sign of desperation.
Quick, what land do the terrorist hold? Nothing. They have no organized army and have never made an offensive attacks.
"Oh wait, but they can hide in the cities, eat there, attack the troops every so often, and come back."
You guys who say this no nothing whatsoever and are living in a dream world. Where is the money for bullets, food, housing, and medicine that is need for fighting? Outside of the money stolen from the Iraqi treasury, which will run out eventually, where are they going to get it? Iraqis, who are having trouble supporting themselves? They are probably robbing for food. This insurgency is not an army, only glorified criminals.
And no one sells a war. We went to war because we had to. To everyone who says this war wasn't neccessary, imagine what it would be like with Sadaam still in power. It would be worst with no hope of ever changing. We made more progress by taking Sadaam out than we ever would by leaving him in.
What would you rather do instead of taking Sadaam out? Keep giving aid to the dictators? Promote Western metrosexual life? Give speeches? Take tours?