It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ISPs Urged to Log E-mail, Chat-Room Activity (moved from ATSNN)
page: 10
share:
The U.S. Justice Department held a private meeting along with several internet service providers and the National Center for Missing and Exploited
Children. Among the topics discussed was the possibility of requiring ISPs to retain records of their customers' online activities for a two month
period. Data recorded by the ISPs would include "records of e-mail chatter, Web browsing or chat-room activity." This data would be used by law
enforcement officials to combat child pornography and other criminal activities.
news.com.com
McClure said that while the Justice Department representatives argued that Internet service providers should cooperate voluntarily, they also raised the "possibility that we should create by law a standard period of data retention." McClure added that "my sense was that this is something that they've been working on for a long time."
This represents an abrupt shift in the Justice Department's long-held position that data retention is unnecessary and imposes an unacceptable burden on Internet providers. In 2001, the Bush administration expressed "serious reservations about broad mandatory data retention regimes."
The current proposal appears to originate with the Justice Department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, which enforces federal child pornography laws. But once mandated by law, the logs likely would be mined during terrorism, copyright infringement and even routine criminal investigations. (The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.)
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
There are currently no laws mandating ISPs to keep log files of this type. There were also no specifics given as to what limitations would be placed on law enforcement to prevent the abuse of the private sector. While I feel this could be beneficial to the arrest of child pornographers, I don't support any law that allows government into my private life arbitrarily. The article also states that if an "internet provider were to retain all traffic data, the database would swell to a size of 20,000 to 40,000 terabytes--too large to search using existing technology." If something like this was mandated, it stands to reason that the monthly rate for internet service could rise.
A part of me wonders if this is another attempt by our government to gain a backdoor into our private lives. It may be a sincere attempt to combat child porn. It may also be a scare tactic by the Justice Department to convince ISPs to cooperate for fear of being labeled a child porn advocate.
[edit on 20-6-2005 by FreeThinking1]
news.com.com
McClure said that while the Justice Department representatives argued that Internet service providers should cooperate voluntarily, they also raised the "possibility that we should create by law a standard period of data retention." McClure added that "my sense was that this is something that they've been working on for a long time."
This represents an abrupt shift in the Justice Department's long-held position that data retention is unnecessary and imposes an unacceptable burden on Internet providers. In 2001, the Bush administration expressed "serious reservations about broad mandatory data retention regimes."
The current proposal appears to originate with the Justice Department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, which enforces federal child pornography laws. But once mandated by law, the logs likely would be mined during terrorism, copyright infringement and even routine criminal investigations. (The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday.)
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
There are currently no laws mandating ISPs to keep log files of this type. There were also no specifics given as to what limitations would be placed on law enforcement to prevent the abuse of the private sector. While I feel this could be beneficial to the arrest of child pornographers, I don't support any law that allows government into my private life arbitrarily. The article also states that if an "internet provider were to retain all traffic data, the database would swell to a size of 20,000 to 40,000 terabytes--too large to search using existing technology." If something like this was mandated, it stands to reason that the monthly rate for internet service could rise.
A part of me wonders if this is another attempt by our government to gain a backdoor into our private lives. It may be a sincere attempt to combat child porn. It may also be a scare tactic by the Justice Department to convince ISPs to cooperate for fear of being labeled a child porn advocate.
[edit on 20-6-2005 by FreeThinking1]
"Safety of the Children" is one of the common catch-all excuses for why your rights are about to be infrenged upon once again. Get used to it.
I wonder if Verizon would do this???
Reason I state that is because they had a big ass blown out battle wit the RIAA and made them back off...
ANyway good post.. I should pay more attention to this..
Reason I state that is because they had a big ass blown out battle wit the RIAA and made them back off...
ANyway good post.. I should pay more attention to this..
new topics
-
What is the white pill?
Philosophy and Metaphysics: 57 minutes ago -
Mike Pinder The Moody Blues R.I.P.
Music: 1 hours ago -
Putin, Russia and the Great Architects of the Universe
ATS Skunk Works: 4 hours ago -
A Warning to America: 25 Ways the US is Being Destroyed
New World Order: 9 hours ago
0