It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
William Raduchel, the company's chairman and CEO, described the difficulty of competing with free file-sharing services and the need to change the public's attitude about copyright infringement.
"That there is a generation of kids who believe that intellectual property should be stolen at will and that it is not a problem is a problem, and it leads to a lot of other things down the road," Raduchel told United Press International. "(Colleges) have a moral obligation to do something about it. Congress, just a month ago, made it a new federal crime punishable by three years in prison to post for download an unpublished copyrighted work that is going to be published. Effect on behavior, as far as I can tell: zero."
Tess Taylor, president of the National Association of Record Industry Professionals, agreed that consumer attitudes needed to be modified.
"Something that I promote heavily is the education that is so necessary to get away from what is otherwise an honest and lawful citizen being seduced by self-interest into thinking that theft is OK," Taylor told the conference audience.
Shapiro argued that the kind of education proposed by those in favor of increased copyright protection would be one-sided.
"The content industry has been clever, flexible, and absolutely ruthless in defining the debate to meet their content policy objectives," he said. "The content (industry) has taken control of language and painted technology enthusiasts as thieves out to plunder our profits and shipwreck the entire music industry."
Content representatives admitted the industry needs to find better ways of effectively utilizing peer-to-peer technology for legitimate use -- although they emphasized the industry embraces the technology.
"One of the things that the motion-picture industry needs to do is to get more product out there on services like CinemaNow and other Internet services," Attaway said, adding it is essential for the movie studios to provide alternatives to stealing.
"Without a doubt, legal (peer-to-peer) networks will be the largest market for all intellectual property," said Russ Reeder, CEO of Rightsline, a company in Beverly Hills, Calif., that provides online business rights management.
Reeder told the conference audience that in order to use legitimate P2P technology effectively, a system of copyright tracking must be developed to pay copyright owners for use of their content, and digital-rights management should be enabled to prevent unauthorized copying after a legitimate download.
Originally posted by klain
torrent will definatly take over from P2P if it has'nt already hackers will invent new tech which they have already done to avoid being caught like making each seeder/downloader a tracker
its a little unfortunate that people are bringing down a few torrent sites like suprnova.org but more sites and tech crop up to stop this power to the seeders!!!
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by sardion2000
It can be controled quite easily.
How? They have not succeeded yet so I don't think it's quite so easy as you think it is
Through internet service providers. Ever heard about the server based content filtering? Just issue a few laws to force the ISP to let's say "fully cooperate with RIAA". Of course not all traffic can be controlled that way, but the access to the large(publicly known) sources could be disabled within hours.
Originally posted by Misfit
Originally posted by longbow
Originally posted by sardion2000
It can be controled quite easily.
How? They have not succeeded yet so I don't think it's quite so easy as you think it is
Through internet service providers. Ever heard about the server based content filtering? Just issue a few laws to force the ISP to let's say "fully cooperate with RIAA". Of course not all traffic can be controlled that way, but the access to the large(publicly known) sources could be disabled within hours.
Ya, that's it, make the ISP do it. I swear it's almost a weekly basis I see a new bit that someone says it should be the ISP's responsablility (last week it was the porn filter, Utah I believe).
Praytell, why should the ISP's be LEGALLY bound to the friggen RIAA?
I think the ISP should be legally responsible to scratch my asss because I waste so much valuable time online.
ISP = Internet Service Provider
........NOT
ISP = Internet Service Parent
Originally posted by Zipdot
For those who believe that forced torrenting of web pages and whatnot is a great idea, well, participating in torrenting is OPTIONAL. If a user doesn't want to use his upload bandwidth to speed other users' downloads, he does not have to.