It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
I think you guys are speaking from your hearts and not from your heads. You read the word "regulation" and your heart cries for freedom lost. We're talking classification here, not control. That's all. Has your freedom to visit government sites been taken away because they're classified .gov? No. Has your right to visit anti-tyrrany websites like Amnesty International been quashed because they're classified .org? No. This regulation is simply calling a spade a spade.
So what would make this kind of undertaking possbile? Stricter laws. More laws. The U.S. government's hand forcing changes.
The prudent choice is to police your own children, since you'll have to end up policing your own children anyways.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
The Netnanny works? Great. But saying that bullet-proof vests protect you fine from bullets doesn't mean that guns should be left lying around on the street.
Moving all porn to .xxx does not by itself imply that children wouldn't be able to view it.
The movement of the material to .xxx sites would not by itself accomplish anything effective whatsoever and would necessitate follow-up changes in regulation.
Hmm...okay. You convinced me.
Whether you'll admit it or not, finding porn on the Internet requires active motion, not passive browsing of business, education, recreation, etc. related web pages.
Before ya know it, when signing on to the net, you'll be passing through a virtual gate that will identify you and tag you.
Very many porn sites exist only for the purpose of entrapping naive surfers so that their trojans and whatnot can be downloaded onto the unsuspecting surfers' computers.
I'm not against future categorization - I am against retroactively moving web pages to the .xxx domain.