posted on May, 23 2005 @ 12:05 PM
Since this is unprecedented in politics, we need to understand the repercussions of whether or not it is done.
How difficult is an up or down vote to comprehend?
This may affect us of both political persuasions for decades to come.
A Senate rule such as the filibuster may only be changed by the consent of a two-thirds majority. At least, that's the rules of the Senate as they
stood for 200 years, but Bill Frist and George W. Bush don't like it. So the first rule they'll have to break is the rule that says you need 67
senators to change a Senate rule:
To get there, Republicans will have to evade a requirement that they have a two-thirds vote -- 67 of 100 senators -- to change the chamber's rules.
Republicans will argue that they are attempting to set a precedent, not change the Senate rules, to disallow the use of filibusters as a delaying
tactic on judicial nominations.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
As far as it concerns the right wing 'swing' this may possibly be done mostly because judges have never been treated this way on the source of
The overwhelming fear of potential Supreme Court judges is clouding the vision of those who will cause this to come about.
[edit on 23-5-2005 by siriuslyone]