A sincere believer (and a good man) can still be wrong.
The only way to judge if he is a prophet or not is to look at his record. Has he ever been wrong on a prophesy? If so, then no matter how good he
is, he ISN'T a prophet.
That's right, to be considered a prophet (based on the bible) you have to have a 100% accuracy rate.
I do not know if he is a prophet or not, but he could still be wrong. After all, I don't recall Charles Manson asking for money for his stuff
either.
(Last minute thought:
None of this should be read to denigrate David Eells. My point is that people should do their own homework.)