An old post, apologies I missed this while it was fresh.
"The debunking attempts that I've read so far don't stand up to my logic yet. " == Bursuc
In my personal opinion, no serious investigator is well armed without a complete reading of
Sherlock Holmes. The Canon's of Sir Aurthur Conan Doyle are completely readable online now.
(Complete canon of Conan Doyle)
When dealing with testimonials, any competent ability for inquiry will serve you well indeed.
"I cannot tell you too much about Mr English. But I will suggest where you can find the reading on Bill..
Peter Brooksmith - The Government Files" == Dallas
How about a strange suggestion for you believers out there ? Instead of going bent for leather down the
yellow brick road, try some of the skeptic sites. After the Canon's of Doyle, you should be able to
use your basic inquiry training to attack their logic. If you cannot at least do that, you are doomed to
keep discussing such topics as the shape shifting royals and how the 1938 Orson Well's broadcast was a real invasion.
(Not intended as a putdown, as I won a bet over those. Hey guys, you ain't gonna believe what the folks on this site are
But I was quoting Dallas. Hey Dallas, here is the Bill English story with skeptic comments.
Pay close attention to the skeptic comments.
(Your mission should you choose to accept it, is to logically refute this skeptics logic. As usual, this post will
self destruct in 30 seconds.)