It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I did a few threads on that early on. The asshats who puked up the official narrative were there. saved for all time.
originally posted by: nonspecific
Yeah I got a huge was of cash for spreading lies online.
I'm retired now.
a reply to: Tekner
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: nonspecific
There's not a great deal to say really is there.
Pandemic of the unvaccinated sounds like something political as opposed to scientific.
There's also a limit to the amount of abuse you can take in one day so I'm personally saving my interaction for later on when I've got some real world stuff out of the way.
a reply to: network dude
no offence, but you are a bit weak in the "I'm going to kill you" department. While you have been a bit vax happy, you still show signs of intelligent life. You weren't the prey I was hoping would come along.
The one's who argued against natural immunity, and puked up the official narrative about shaming those who didn't want the shot need a bit of love. (IMHO). If the information doesn't change soon, most won't be able to deny the reality.
I am new here so I missed these wonderful conversations where natural immunity was criminalised and condemned.
But imagine one claims that vaccine immunity is superior to natural immunity?!
Let's say you produce antibodies only against one antigenic site and on the other hand against 26 or 27. I can't remember exactly.
It's the same people who in the absence of evidence and absence of knowledge of basic principles in biology and immunology, argue on the basis of politics and ideology.
originally posted by: Narvasis
Hello ATS!!
It’s your old pal posing another very simple question to the community. Specifically to people that are pro covid shots. The question is this:
If the covid shots were never tested for transmission before market, how was it a “!!!PANDEMIC OF THE UNVACCINATED!!!”?
Please answer the question without deflections to other subjects. It’s a simple question, it should have a simple response. That’s all that many heard for MONTHS. That it’s because of unvaccinated people that others are getting sick still. That “covid stops with you”.
Please explain this to me in a logical way that makes sense.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: Dalamax
The shot never vaccinated anyone from anything, therefore everyone was unvaccinated, and the media beat the drums of pestilence.
With your permission, I'd like to pinch that please.
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: Narvasis
Eh, aren’t French generals known for giving up or something though?
a reply to: carewemust
originally posted by: thebtheb
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: nonspecific
There's not a great deal to say really is there.
Pandemic of the unvaccinated sounds like something political as opposed to scientific.
There's also a limit to the amount of abuse you can take in one day so I'm personally saving my interaction for later on when I've got some real world stuff out of the way.
a reply to: network dude
no offence, but you are a bit weak in the "I'm going to kill you" department. While you have been a bit vax happy, you still show signs of intelligent life. You weren't the prey I was hoping would come along.
The one's who argued against natural immunity, and puked up the official narrative about shaming those who didn't want the shot need a bit of love. (IMHO). If the information doesn't change soon, most won't be able to deny the reality.
I am new here so I missed these wonderful conversations where natural immunity was criminalised and condemned.
But imagine one claims that vaccine immunity is superior to natural immunity?!
Let's say you produce antibodies only against one antigenic site and on the other hand against 26 or 27. I can't remember exactly.
It's the same people who in the absence of evidence and absence of knowledge of basic principles in biology and immunology, argue on the basis of politics and ideology.
This is pretty much it for me. Early on, in April 2020, I was truly amazed at how easily the public was deceived into thinking natural immunity wasn't a thing. It was right then that I knew something was deeply wrong. I'm not a scientist, etc. etc., but the information on viruses and natural immunity has been around for decades. And we're expected to believe that suddenly, this new virus doesn't abide by the same rules?
But people just don't know much about anything it appears.