NEW Oxford study shows a big decline in immune system

a reply to: anonentity

May I ask why you made a thread about a new "Oxford study" without posting a link to it and apparently without having even read it?

Doesn't do your credibility any favours.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: anonentity

May I ask why you made a thread about a new "Oxford study" without posting a link to it and apparently without having even read it?

Doesn't do your credibility any favours.

We've been seeing things like this a lot since 2020, usually from the same handful of people.

They spam the forum with content claiming that a scientific paper has concluded that we're all doomed, and then they link to an article from Rumble, or a Bitchute video in which somebody tells us that a scientific study has concluded that we're all doomed.

Typically, they throw in a couple for graphs or some soundbites out of context, and they don't link back to the original.

It's also pretty common for them to throw in some things that we already knew, and them proclaim that they're cutting-edge information.

Mostly, these people post the content because they're preaching to an echo chamber consisting of people who already believe that we're all doomed, and thus don't bother searching for the original paper, and they often don't understand things like chemistry or statistics so they couldn't call out the fakery even if they were interested in doing so.

A good example are all of the posts saying that vaxxed people are dying at a higher rate than unvaxxed people.

Which is 100 percent true, since the people who are vaxxed and boosted the most tend to be elderly people with diabetes or heart conditions, or renal failure. While the people who are the least vaxxed and boosted tend to be young people with no heart conditions and such.

In essence, the data is showing that old people are more likely to die than young people.

Another good example is where they post content that was in Trump's whitehouse briefings, 2 years ago, and then claim that it's revolutionary. Such as the vax only being about 86 percent effective, or about covid only killing about 1.3 percent of people.

We had one the other day saying that the vaccine could be transmitted to babies by nursing mothers. Well ... yes. This is something that often happens with vaccines. It was what we thought would happen. But the person who posted it conveniently forgot to mention that this was only in the first 2 days after vaccination, and that the people doing the research concluded that it was perfectly safe.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: thethinkingman

Not bothered to read the study, then?

Figures.

More like ... hoping that we won't.

Data shows that people who are obese fair worse if they get sick with covid, and that the vax doesn't protect them as well.

But we knew this already as it's based on existing science. You see this in many other areas as well.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

The OP didn't even bother linking to the study he mentions.

Doubt he even read it.

Totally dishonest.

New documentary - SAFE AND EFFECTIVE

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Do you actually need a study, to see what's going on around you? There is enough evidence pouring out to suggest this is put on hold for a thorough independent investigation. That's unless you are potentially suicidal. Or don't care. I personally no longer care either way. If you trust it gets a booster.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Do you actually need a study, to see what's going on around you? There is enough evidence pouring out to suggest this is put on hold for a thorough independent investigation. That's unless you are potentially suicidal. Or don't care. I personally no longer care either way. If you trust it gets a booster.

I don't know anyone who has had a serious bad reaction, caught 'VAIDS' or any of the other vaccine induced conditions claimed to be happening all the time on this site

In fact I don't even know anyone who knows anyone.

This is consistent with the studies that show serious reactions to be very rare.

So on one side I have my own experience and the overwhelming weight of evidence.

On the other side I have conspiracy theorists posting bitchute videos that are repeatedly shown (as in this thread) to be making false claims.

What way is this going to go...

a reply to: anonentity

Well, if you're going to post a thread about a study then yes, you should post a link to it.

Isn't that just bleeding obvious and basic?

Sorry. It's just that simple.

Except in COVID Clown World, apparently.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The thread is about Alex Jones basically stating a couple of things. That the unwinding and failure of the vaccines are planned.That the Oxford study shows that the immune systems are damaged.With a bonus thrown in that a leading proponent of the vaccine now thinks it wasn't that great an idea and should be stopped. All valid reminders that giving free burgers and fries for taking it, and losing your livelihood if you didn't was always a bit of a suspicious ploy to a skeptical mind.
He might be right as all the mainstream proponents seem to be falling in line and letting the negative information, now the insurance companies are saying that they are paying out a lot more than the original forty percent. One over a hundred percent. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

Post a thread about a study, link it.

The thread is about a "study".

For goodness sakes.

Bitchute?

Then you should have used the title

"Bitchute video of Alex Jones stating a couple of things about COVID vaccines"

It would have been a more honest title.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The thread is about Alex Jones basically stating a couple of things. That the unwinding and failure of the vaccines are planned.That the Oxford study shows that the immune systems are damaged.With a bonus thrown in that a leading proponent of the vaccine now thinks it wasn't that great an idea and should be stopped. All valid reminders that giving free burgers and fries for taking it, and losing your livelihood if you didn't was always a bit of a suspicious ploy to a skeptical mind.
He might be right as all the mainstream proponents seem to be falling in line and letting the negative information, now the insurance companies are saying that they are paying out a lot more than the original forty percent. One over a hundred percent. www.bitchute.com...

originally posted by: thethinkingman
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

jesus #ing christ, i cant believe this is STILL happening. Do people literally need a clip of the pfizer ceo sitting in dark room stroking a cat saying "this is the best scam we ever came up with".

And to be fair, even then people would still be like aww look at the cute kitty!

Awwwww....

Look at the cute kitty ! !

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Regardless of this thread

We've been seeing things like this a lot since 2020, usually from the same handful of people.

You are by far the worst offender here.
Look at your entire profile.
Everyone here knows what the msm is saying, but you hit every thread like it's your gd employment with your jerky, concern trolling antidiluvianesqe style.

Pfizer found this in their medications...then asked to silence it.
You can't be trusted at all

BNT162b2
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports
APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
1p36 deletion syndrome; 2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria; 5'nucleotidase increased; Acoustic
neuritis; Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency; Acquired epidermolysis bullosa; Acquired epileptic
aphasia; Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;
Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures; Acute febrile neutrophilic
dermatosis; Acute flaccid myelitis; Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis; Acute
haemorrhagic oedema of infancy; Acute kidney injury; Acute macular outer retinopathy;
Acute motor axonal neuropath y; Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy; Acute myocardial
infarction; Acute respiratory distress syndrome [Note by Celia Farber: "that sounds like






'Covid 19'."]; Acute respiratory failure; Addison's disease; Administration site thrombosis;
Administration site vasculitis; Adrenal thrombosis; Adverse event following immunisation;
Ageusia; Agranulocytosis; Air embolism; Alanine aminotransferase abnormal; Alanine
aminotransferase increased; Alcoholic seizure; Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis; Allergic
oedema; Alloimmune hepatitis; Alopecia areata; Alpers disease; Alveolar proteinosis;
Ammonia abnormal; Ammonia increased; Amniotic cavity infection;
Amygdalohippocampectomy; Amyloid arthropathy; Amyloidosis; Amyloidosis senile;
Anaphylactic reaction; Anaphylactic shock; Anaphylactic transfusion reaction; Anaphylactoid
reaction; Anaphylactoid shock; Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy; Angioedema;
Angiopathic neuropathy; Ankylosing spondy litis; Anosmia; Antiacetylcholine receptor
antibody positive; Anti-actin antibody positive; Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positive; Anti-
basal ganglia antibody positive; Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive; Anti-
epithelial antibody positive; Anti-erythrocyte antibody positive; Anti-exosome complex
antibody positive; Anti- GAD antibody negative; Anti-GAD antibody positive; Anti-ganglioside
antibody positive; Antigliadin antibody positive; Anti-glomerular basement membrane
antibody positive; Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease; Anti-glycyl-tRNA
synthetase antibody positive; Anti-HLA antibody test positive; Anti-IA2 antibody positive;
Anti-insulin antibody increased; Anti-insulin antibody positive; Anti-insulin receptor antibody
increased; Anti-insulin receptor antibody positive; Anti-interferon antibody negative; Anti-
interferon antibody positive; Anti-islet cell antibody positive; Antimitochondrial antibody
positive; Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive; Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein
antibodies positive; Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein associated polyneuropathy;
Antimyocardial antibody positive; Anti-neuronal antibody positive; Antineutrophil
cytoplasmic antibody increased; Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive; Anti-
neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis; Anti-NMDA antibody positive;
Antinuclear antibody increased; Antinuclear antibody positive; Antiphospholipid antibodies
positive; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Anti-platelet antibody positive; Anti-prothrombin
antibody positive; Antiribosomal P antibody positive; Anti-RNA polymerase ll antibody
positive; Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody test positive; Anti-sperm antibody
positive; Anti-SRP antibody positive; Antisynthetase syndrome; Anti-thyroid antibody
positive; Anti-transglutaminase antibody increased; Anti-VGCC antibody positive; Anti-VGKC
antibody positive; Anti-vimentin antibody positive; Antiviral prophylaxis; Antiviral treatment;
Anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody positive; Aortic embolus; Aortic thrombosis; Aortitis; Aplasia
pure red cell; Aplastic anaemia; Application site thrombosis; Application site vasculitis;
Arrhythmia; Arterial bypass occlusion; Arterial bypass thrombosis; Arterial thrombosis;
Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis; Arteriovenous graft site stenosis; Arteriovenous graft
thrombosis; Arteritis; Arteritis
CONFIDENTIAL Page 1
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0000083

a reply to: Mandroid7

In fact, if you have got anything wrong with you that your immune system is keeping in check. When the immune system gets hammered so do you. Each successive stab drops it a few more times. Brought to you by Pfizer, Most flu vaccines drop the immune system for a couple of weeks, but this one might do it for a far longer period.

a reply to: anonentity


double

a reply to: anonentity

Do you actually need a study, to see what's going on around you? There is enough evidence pouring out to suggest this is put on hold for a thorough independent investigation.

I personally need some kind of evidence other than a Bitch ute video. Especially since I do not see hordes of vaccinated people dropping dead around me. 

a reply to: tamusan

But if you considered covid to be killing "hordes" of people around you and you'd notice without it being completely focused on for 2 years like it was the only thing in the entire world, you wouldnt. 0.02% of people died in the world in 2020. In your particular country, people aged 0 to 59, the percentage of them that died would have been ABSOLUTELY unnoticeable, so assuming you'd notice "hordes" of people dying from the vaccine is just ignorant. Especially if you're not even assuming or looking for it.

if 5000 people died from the vaxx in your country that would be more than the amount of people who died aged 0 to 59 in the uk in 2020 from covid.

People die from all kinds of stuff all the time and you're not like OMG PEOPLE ARE DYING, LEFT, RIGHT AND CENTRE.

There ARE people dying from this. it went from ohhhhh its very rare. To its rare. to yeah well medicines kill some people, to yeah but its not like zillions of people. Its ridiculous. This is dangerous stuff. It hasnt been tested. Genetics and biology are one the most complicated things in the entire universe, the materials involved in this are billionths of a metre in size and to presume "someone" knows about all this absolutely, totally, completely ignorant.

The idea of not being cautious about this is just so beyond myopic, you'll have to go into the future a few decades to realise how stupid this is. Its like how we started with 1 technology and its very crude compared to what it will be like later. This is in its infancy and CLEARLY not worked out. Clearly dangerous. Just think about how dangerous it is to have particles that can enter basically ANY CELL in your body and instruct them to produce foreign toxic proteins. Which then induce a plethora of immune responses specifically dependent on which cells were transfected.

a reply to: thethinkingman

I work at a hospitals. I notice people dying just about every day and usually know what killed them.

a reply to: tamusan

And what did you notice???? Did you happen to notice alot of people dying when you put them into a coma and stuff pipes into their lungs????